The Following User Says Thank You to soeiro For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-27
, 00:17
|
Posts: 1,258 |
Thanked: 672 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to shadowjk For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-27
, 00:34
|
|
Posts: 1,090 |
Thanked: 476 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Ingolstadt, Germany
|
#3
|
The Following User Says Thank You to b666m For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-01-27
, 00:37
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Berlin, Germany
|
#4
|
- It should have wear leveling or something to prevent it from going to waste too early.
![]() |
2010-01-27
, 12:54
|
Posts: 292 |
Thanked: 131 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#5
|
![]() |
2010-01-27
, 12:55
|
Posts: 292 |
Thanked: 131 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#6
|
ext3...
... or ext4 WITHOUT extents.
(since with extents it's no longer backward compatible and can not be used as ext3 fs)
so i think that n900 will mount it as ext3 and other unix-OSs as ext4 (with all improvements like online-defragmentation and checksums in journal)
edit: haven't tested it yet, but you could try it... and if it doesn't work reformat as ext3...
and of course... post your experiences here ^^
What would be the best option? Ext4 or ext3 without journaling?
What are your thoughts on this?
Thanks
Help improve N900, vote for:
Information about what the email client is doing
Find applications easily with tags for sub-menus
A better help system
Limit download of emails per connection type (don't fetch attachments)
A better use of internal flash
Last edited by soeiro; 2010-01-27 at 12:50. Reason: typo