![]() |
2010-01-27
, 14:34
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#2
|
![]() |
2010-01-27
, 14:38
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#3
|
It's one big minefield. One claims to invent the proximity sensor, the other claims to invent the intelligent proximity sensor... childish, too, isn't it?
![]() |
2010-01-27
, 14:40
|
Posts: 162 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#4
|
|
2010-01-27
, 14:43
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#5
|
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
So, the big news on iNgadget is about the new Apple patent.
A patent for a proximity-sensing touchscreen.
What puts me off and yet again reminds me how I don't like the patent system is... How in Gods name can such a patent not already exist? I mean... That's like not patenting hand gesture controlled interfaces. Is the patent system only revolving around Apple, Microsoft, Nokia and IBM? How does this control inovation when it never used for actual real inventions, only for already existing technology...
I r get mucho frustrate. *grumble*