Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 15 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#1
Hello all.

I am attempting to write a small program for my N900. I have set everything up and ready to go. It seems that ESbox comes ready to create Qt or GTK applications. I use a mix of both on my desktop, and have never developed for either, so I have no preference.

Anyone know why there's 2? Either of them "official" or "unofficial"? Does anyone know of a particular reason to use one and not the other?

Thanks.
fuzzbuzz
 
Posts: 434 | Thanked: 325 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#2
If you are interested to learn something that is future proof, then Qt is the way to go. I personally have no experience with GTK, but I've been using Qt for a bit now and I really like it. However, this is only my personal opinion.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sasler For This Useful Post:
Posts: 162 | Thanked: 79 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Finland
#3
After PR1.2 goes public Qt 4.6 is officially supported. I'd say that you should use Qt with the same explanation as the previous poster. If you're developing with python then there's also the choice between PyQt and PySide bindings that gives another problem. Can't really say an expert opinion about that.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to chainreaction For This Useful Post:
noobmonkey's Avatar
Posts: 3,203 | Thanked: 1,391 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Worthing, England
#4
pyqt - just learnt it, seems fine to me
__________________
----------- Follow me on Twitter here
----------- My Photography Website and Blog is here
----------- Author of the N900 Health Check Application ----------- New Version in Extras Devel (Dec 2010 - 2.9.10)
----------- Are you on the N900 World Map? - http://pininthemap.com/maemo - masterpin: shotgun
----------- What apps do you want to see on the n900 or in MeeGo in the future? -
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to noobmonkey For This Useful Post:
Posts: 432 | Thanked: 645 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#5
Hi,

I think developing with Qt in QtCreator might be an option for you and with the integration of the tech preview of MADDE - as a cross-compilation tool - into QtCreator the easiest way to go. Look at this post for more links & information.

Daniel
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danielwilms For This Useful Post:
Posts: 15 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#6
Yeah I thought Qt might be better, because I know Nokia bought Trolltech a while ago.

Thanks for your inputs. MADDE and QtCreator seem especially cool.
 
Posts: 328 | Thanked: 101 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#7
QT. Since QT can be used on symbian too and other platforms such as windows or mac.

QT belongs to Nokia so go figure .
 
slobodsky's Avatar
Posts: 63 | Thanked: 41 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Moscow
#8
Qt, of course. I did use GTK+ a while ago and I don't like it - plain C doesn't fit well for object oriented programming. Qt's C++ is much clearer. Qt is cross-platform: my application runs on MS Windows, Linux, Windows Mobile (crawls) and Maemo. I'm shure I'll port it to the MeeGo without problems.
Also you can do main job in the desktop version and make only the Maemo-specific features in scratchbox or on device. It's much simpler.
__________________
Sorry for bad English. If you can point out mistakes in this post, send me a private message.

Last edited by slobodsky; 2010-03-19 at 21:58.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:23.