![]() |
2010-03-18
, 15:52
|
Posts: 120 |
Thanked: 69 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ NL
|
#2
|
![]() |
2010-03-24
, 21:37
|
Posts: 30 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#3
|
![]() |
2010-03-24
, 21:42
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#4
|
![]() |
2010-03-24
, 22:17
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 995 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ California
|
#5
|
The Following User Says Thank You to egoshin For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-24
, 22:22
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 995 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ California
|
#6
|
So why are the thumbnails reconstructed? is there no cache mechanism??
The Following User Says Thank You to egoshin For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-24
, 22:39
|
Posts: 889 |
Thanked: 537 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ scotland
|
#7
|
I notice that after some reboot (or crash, not sure) and after a usb mass-storage disconnect, the process hildon-thumbnailerd run for some time(3~5 mins) at full cpu. This impact the battery life..
I notice that during this period, the thumbnails of the galery are reconstructed.
So why are the thumbnails reconstructed? is there no cache mechanism?? is it a bug...
Gilles