![]() |
2012-06-07
, 11:40
|
Posts: 1,067 |
Thanked: 2,383 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ Finland
|
#3
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rainisto For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-06-07
, 20:11
|
Posts: 9 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
|
#4
|
The Following User Says Thank You to hmallat For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-06-08
, 13:38
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Jun 2012
|
#5
|
Nice idea, but some difficulties:
- You cannot control from applications when or how to poll for tags, the system keeps that to itself. N9 only polls for tags when the phone is not idle (when the display is on). So checking every 5 seconds on an idle device is out of the question.
![]() |
2012-06-08
, 15:52
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#6
|
![]() |
2012-06-08
, 16:02
|
Posts: 1,341 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#7
|
![]() |
2012-06-09
, 14:23
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Jun 2012
|
#8
|
I have an idea, but i don't know IF it could work, or HOW to do it.
this is the idea: to have an application that has two sub-states:
normal state: the smartphone (nokia n9 in my case) is silent and/because is next to an NFC tag.
alarm state: the smartphone makes a hell of a noise and/because is far from the above tag
the trigger from normal to alarm would be a check of the proximity with the tag (every 5 seconds? don't know), and the trigger from alarm to normal would be a password / facelock / voice check / blood exam / whatever.
the reason i thought of this system is simple: in a subway, in a swimming pool (if you leave the smartphone on sight), or wherever, it's more difficult to steal the smartphone AND the NFC tag than the smartphone alone. this is truer when the tag and the phone are in different pockets of the same jacket for example.
when it's about coding, I am THE IGNORANCE in the flesh
i don't even have an NFC tag, so i really have no idea what i'm talking about
but maybe you do