Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,096 | Thanked: 760 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#1
http://www.graphics.stanford.edu/papers/fcam/fcam.pdf

and

http://www.graphics.stanford.edu/papers/fcam/fcam.mov

"Our
Lucky Imaging application uses an experimental Nokia 3-axis
gyroscope affxed to the front of the N900 to detect hand shake.
....
We use an external gyroscope because the internal
accelerometer in the N900 is not suffciently accurate for this task"


Does anyone have more info how this is working, over USB? maybe look at fcam source to see how it is communicatiing with gyroscope?

They say this is nokia experimental, but is there anything out there comparable that is available?

thanks, just curious
Attached Images
 
 
lcuk's Avatar
Posts: 1,635 | Thanked: 1,816 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ Manchester, England
#2
depending on how often they are checking the onboard accelerometer and whether they are using the smoothed interface I could almost believe them
but I rarely see unexpected jitter

Dunno where the outboard is from, looks interesting though
__________________
liqbase sketching the future.
like what i say? hit the Thanks, thanks!
twitter.com/lcuk
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#3
Wow. An accessory. Finally. Now, can anyone get one to play with and use it for development? No? Thought so.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
Posts: 119 | Thanked: 49 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#4
that gyro application is pretty cool, and thi short-long exposure alternation on the panorama too!
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#5
It's great--but it's all pointless unless and until it's actually released. There'll certainly be a lack of apps until at LEAST developers see it.
 
joerg_rw's Avatar
Posts: 2,222 | Thanked: 12,651 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ SOL 3
#6
Originally Posted by quipper8 View Post
We use an external gyroscope because the internal
accelerometer in the N900 is not suffciently accurate for this task"
quite nonsensical. The builtin is an accelerometer and thus incapable by design and by concept to detect shaking relevant for camera.

A gyro is not an accelerometer aka g-meterThey are complementary, each one is sensing the movement the other one can't detect.

So the rationale given is extremely missleading


For the connecting topic I'd guess they exploit some of the testpads under battery. If source can tell details, I'd be highly interested. Don't think they are using a USB hostmode fixed to working state en passant.

/jOERG
__________________
Maemo Community Council member [2012-10, 2013-05, 2013-11, 2014-06 terms]
Hildon Foundation Council inaugural member.
MCe.V. foundation member

EX Hildon Foundation approved
Maemo Administration Coordinator (stepped down due to bullying 2014-04-05)
aka "techstaff" - the guys who keep your infra running - Devotion to Duty http://xkcd.com/705/

IRC(freenode): DocScrutinizer*
First USB hostmode fanatic, father of H-E-N
 
Posts: 1,096 | Thanked: 760 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#7
Originally Posted by joerg_rw View Post

For the connecting topic I'd guess they exploit some of the testpads under battery. If source can tell details, I'd be highly interested. Don't think they are using a USB hostmode fixed to working state en passant.

/jOERG
yes, this is what I am most interested in, how are they getting output from gyro into phone
 
Posts: 1,463 | Thanked: 1,916 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Edmonton, AB
#8
cool. i have faith there are some huge frankenstein bolts connecting it to the phone.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Creamy Goodness For This Useful Post:
Posts: 14 | Thanked: 124 times | Joined on Jul 2010
#9
Hi all,

I'm one of the Stanford guys involved in the project. The external gyro is something Nokia Research got made to test gyroscope-using apps. It communicates to the phone over bluetooth with timestamped 3-axis angular velocities. Unfortunately the bluetooth communication isn't hugely reliable, even at such a short distance, and the whole app was a little flaky as a result.

We referred to the built-in accelerometer as insufficiently accurate because a) accelerometers don't detect rotations of the camera that cause blur (i.e. joerg_rw is right), only the linear accelerations (which are usually less of a problem), and b) we needed a fairly high data rate and high precision to detect the small movements that cause a several-pixel blur in the output image.

Our most recent version of this app just directly looks for sharp edges in images, and seems to work more reliably (it's included in fcamera as the best-of-8 burst mode). Oh well

- Andrew
 

The Following 24 Users Say Thank You to abadams For This Useful Post:
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#10
As usual, Microsoft comes along and claims they're pioneering something someone else (often, everyone else) has already been doing long before they "invent" it:

http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/08/02...-during-shots/

Sounds a lot like YOUR work. Grrrr
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:10.