![]() |
2015-09-01
, 13:13
|
Posts: 1,548 |
Thanked: 7,510 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Czech Republic
|
#2
|
I just would like to know if there was some analysis about how SFOS behaves compared to similar mobile OSes, I mean iOS
and BB10.x which are both *nix and native (AFAIK, Android runs Dalvik/Art and WP runs .Net). And if this comparison was completed, what are its results?
![]() |
2015-09-03
, 08:14
|
Posts: 702 |
Thanked: 2,059 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ UK
|
#4
|
Regarding iOS, there is a very detailed blogpost explaining the five different states an iOS app can have.
This information is more than 3 year old but I guess it's still valid.
![]() |
2015-09-03
, 11:31
|
Posts: 1,378 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Göteborg, Sweden
|
#5
|
AFAIK iOS to this day does not really multitask - only the application that has focus is actually running, applications that are not running are paused (er even killed outright ?), which helps to avoid Oout OF Memory situation at the cost of increased application complexity and by making some application use-cases impossible (background tasks, interacting with two separate applications at the same time, etc.).
The Following User Says Thank You to handaxe For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-09-03
, 12:50
|
Posts: 1,548 |
Thanked: 7,510 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Czech Republic
|
#6
|
And very broadly, this is what Ubuntu Phone/Touch does as well, at least in what is referred to as "staged" mode. Currenbtly, you can use some tweak tools to run in Windowed mode (a foretaste of forthcoming convergence). Apparently, true multi-tasking then is possible (but what OOM strategy would that follow?).
One particular problem to look out for is that because of the way Ubuntu Touch currently handles applications CuteSpotify has to be kept in the foreground and the phone has to be kept switched on for music to play (otherwise the application gets suspended). Approaches for handling applications that need to keep running are currently being debated, so hopefully that won’t be the case in future version of Ubuntu Touch.
![]() |
2015-09-03
, 17:14
|
Posts: 1,378 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Göteborg, Sweden
|
#7
|
![]() |
2015-09-04
, 11:13
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 1,832 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#8
|
The Following User Says Thank You to m4r0v3r For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-09-04
, 14:40
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#9
|
It remains much the same. Ongoing discussion. Pretty much makes Gps programs such as track recorders useless, as who wants the screen on for that use case?
![]() |
2015-09-04
, 15:03
|
Posts: 702 |
Thanked: 2,059 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ UK
|
#10
|
Now you lost me there?
You cannot be talking about Jollla, as GPS tracking with it works perfectly and I use it several times a week, both bicycling and hiking in woods.
My longest tracks are over 3h in length, logging coordinates every second and I have never lost points...
Some months ago, when Jolla changed the behaviour of Sailfish in case of a lack of memory, there were a lot of discussions here and on TJC.
I just would like to know if there was some analysis about how SFOS behaves compared to similar mobile OSes, I mean iOS and BB10.x which are both *nix and native (AFAIK, Android runs Dalvik/Art and WP runs .Net). And if this comparison was completed, what are its results?
A simple question for my own culture and understanding.
Thanks.