![]() |
2012-11-18
, 13:52
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#2
|
![]() |
2012-11-18
, 14:06
|
Posts: 2,000 |
Thanked: 3,345 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
|
#3
|
Hi there, I'm Dragonalas, and I'm new to this forum. I registered purely to ask something about the Nokia N900, which I'm very interested in.
The thing is, I don't need a dedicated phone or a tablet or whatever. I need something to mess around with, but it has to be something worth buying. I've been discussing this with myself for a while now, and I'm trying to figure out whether I should or shouldn't buy this phone/internet tablet thingy even in 2012.
I know it's way out of date and barely (if at all) supported by Nokia, but that's not a problem at all for me. I like spending time customizing my technical stuff so this device seemed perfect for me. I can live with a resistive touch screen (used to capacitive), no mms capabilities (never in my life used mms) and a fragile body (after having my HTC Legend for 2.5 years, there's not 1 visible scratch on it).
To sum it all up, I want a neat little device to spend a lot of my time customizing because that's just what I like to do, and there's nothing about the N900 that seems like so much of a turnoff that I wouldn't consider buying it. So my question to you is, is it still worth it in 2012? I know there are a lot better alternatives, but I don't want those, I am merely interested in this particular one (community also seems great).
The Following User Says Thank You to Wikiwide For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-11-18
, 14:11
|
|
Posts: 1,076 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#4
|
![]() |
2012-11-18
, 14:20
|
Posts: 1,326 |
Thanked: 1,524 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#5
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MINKIN2 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-11-18
, 14:27
|
Posts: 1,680 |
Thanked: 3,685 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#6
|
Though I generally like the 900 which I bought about a year and a half ago, I probably wouldn't go for it now. It is a big plus that you have access to the filesystem, but in my experience, if you're not a "power user" that feature is moot.
My biggest gripe at this point is with battery life. Under 3G I cannot go a full day. I have to switch to 2G for a "day's worth" of standby. I have Google Voice and a SIP client connected via RTCOMM which may or may not be a part of the problem but still the thing should not be giving me warnings after 12 hours with next to no use. It's been this way since I purchased an real Nokia battery and I have no intention of buying the huge batteries to attach to this thing. It is big enough and I don't want it any bigger. That is really my main complaint.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-11-18
, 14:41
|
|
Posts: 1,239 |
Thanked: 1,278 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
@ Balochistan
|
#7
|
![]() |
2012-11-18
, 15:16
|
Posts: 3 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Nov 2012
|
#8
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to dragonalas For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-11-18
, 15:36
|
Posts: 293 |
Thanked: 163 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ beijing-islamabad
|
#9
|
The Following User Says Thank You to imo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-11-18
, 15:39
|
Posts: 59 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Aug 2012
|
#10
|
Hi there, I'm Dragonalas, and I'm new to this forum. I registered purely to ask something about the Nokia N900, which I'm very interested in.
The thing is, I don't need a dedicated phone or a tablet or whatever. I need something to mess around with, but it has to be something worth buying. I've been discussing this with myself for a while now, and I'm trying to figure out whether I should or shouldn't buy this phone/internet tablet thingy even in 2012.
I know it's way out of date and barely (if at all) supported by Nokia, but that's not a problem at all for me. I like spending time customizing my technical stuff so this device seemed perfect for me. I can live with a resistive touch screen (used to capacitive), no mms capabilities (never in my life used mms) and a fragile body (after having my HTC Legend for 2.5 years, there's not 1 visible scratch on it).
To sum it all up, I want a neat little device to spend a lot of my time customizing because that's just what I like to do, and there's nothing about the N900 that seems like so much of a turnoff that I wouldn't consider buying it. So my question to you is, is it still worth it in 2012? I know there are a lot better alternatives, but I don't want those, I am merely interested in this particular one (community also seems great).
The Following User Says Thank You to Tschaka For This Useful Post: | ||
The thing is, I don't need a dedicated phone or a tablet or whatever. I need something to mess around with, but it has to be something worth buying. I've been discussing this with myself for a while now, and I'm trying to figure out whether I should or shouldn't buy this phone/internet tablet thingy even in 2012.
I know it's way out of date and barely (if at all) supported by Nokia, but that's not a problem at all for me. I like spending time customizing my technical stuff so this device seemed perfect for me. I can live with a resistive touch screen (used to capacitive), no mms capabilities (never in my life used mms) and a fragile body (after having my HTC Legend for 2.5 years, there's not 1 visible scratch on it).
To sum it all up, I want a neat little device to spend a lot of my time customizing because that's just what I like to do, and there's nothing about the N900 that seems like so much of a turnoff that I wouldn't consider buying it. So my question to you is, is it still worth it in 2012? I know there are a lot better alternatives, but I don't want those, I am merely interested in this particular one (community also seems great).
Thanks in advance.
On a side note, does anyone know if the Ebay sellers offering this phone for below 200 bucks are trustworthy? I mean I'm a student so cash is tight, meaning that if those Hong Kong sellers with 98% acceptance rate, a lot of positive comments and a lot of sales are trustworthy, I can make some serious cutbacks in the budget. I mean there's the whole Paypal buyer's protection, right? They do also guarantee you 100% satisfaction, and they seem like they know what they're talking about. Here's what I mean:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-NOKIA-N9...item5d2f150399
http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Nokia-N9...item43b40d119a
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Nokia-N-Seri...item3ccbf529ba
Thanks again (sorry if I blabbered on too much).