![]() |
2007-11-07
, 04:12
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#2
|
![]() |
2007-11-07
, 04:30
|
Posts: 31 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Ireland
|
#3
|
![]() |
2007-11-07
, 04:53
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#4
|
![]() |
2007-11-07
, 05:33
|
|
Posts: 2,669 |
Thanked: 2,555 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#5
|
![]() |
2007-11-07
, 05:39
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#6
|
![]() |
2007-11-07
, 13:51
|
Posts: 130 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Maine & Florida - USA
|
#7
|
![]() |
2007-11-07
, 14:07
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#8
|
If XP is/would be/could be installed ... it would run very very slowly. Remember that a common (unoptimized) XP install requires 1.5GB of drive space and 256MB of memory. Not sure if the IT with its current hardware can handle that.
![]() |
2007-11-07
, 15:37
|
|
Posts: 273 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#9
|
![]() |
2007-11-07
, 19:27
|
Posts: 31 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Ireland
|
#10
|
which one would u prefare since most of us use the windows xp, (maybe just talk about my self)
thanx