Reply
Thread Tools
iskarion is offline iskarion
2008-05-30 , 21:46
Posts: 161 | Thanked: 99 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#1
Hi,

recently there have been quite a few articles in IT related media about a vulnerability of the flash plugin.
http://blogs.adobe.com/psirt/2008/05...yer_issue.html
http://www.adobe.com/support/securit...apsb08-11.html
http://www.symantec.com/security_res...tcon/index.jsp

It is stated that this vulnerability is currently only being exploited on Windows, but that it also affects the flash plugin on Linux and OSX. Apparently it is fixed in the most recent version 9.0.124.0.

Now OS2008 obviously doesn't have flahs 9.0.124.0. Any idea if the flash plugin in OS2008's microb is also affected? Or is the OS2008 flash plugin different from the normal Linux flash plugin (ARM...)?
Does Diabolo at least come with flash 9.0.124.0?
Last edited by iskarion; 2008-05-30 at 21:51.
 
Bundyo's Avatar
Bundyo is offline Bundyo
2008-05-30 , 21:54
Posts: 4,708 | Thanked: 4,649 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Bulgaria
#2
The Flash versioning on the NIT is kinda different.
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
 
luca's Avatar
luca is offline luca
2008-05-31 , 10:28
Posts: 1,137 | Thanked: 402 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Catalunya
#3
Originally Posted by Bundyo View Post
The Flash versioning on the NIT is kinda different.
That doesn't mean it is immune, does it?
And the fact that my same question on the mailing list a while ago has been greeted with absolute silence doesn't really make my fears go away.
 
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:52.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top