![]() |
2008-04-06
, 19:33
|
|
Posts: 716 |
Thanked: 236 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#2
|
![]() |
2008-04-07
, 06:42
|
Posts: 393 |
Thanked: 112 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#3
|
![]() |
2008-04-07
, 12:48
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Greater Boston
|
#4
|
![]() |
2008-04-08
, 19:42
|
Posts: 398 |
Thanked: 77 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#5
|
![]() |
2008-04-08
, 20:52
|
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
@ Colorado, USA
|
#6
|
![]() |
2008-04-08
, 21:10
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#7
|
![]() |
2008-05-20
, 22:43
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#8
|
![]() |
2008-05-21
, 05:20
|
|
Posts: 145 |
Thanked: 20 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Seattle, WA USA
|
#9
|
![]() |
2008-05-22
, 13:41
|
Posts: 46 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#10
|
And as an added bonus, the locations I might want to record are often in somewhat canyon-y areas, thus with more limited satellite visibility. (Newer SirfStarIII based systems generally do OK in these areas, but older chipsets often have problems getting fixes.)
I haven't seen many people talking about using it in this way -- anyone had any experience using it like this? Pros or Cons? Would I be better off buying a dedicated GPS unit for this?