Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
sondjata's Avatar
sondjata is offline sondjata
2009-01-06 , 18:54
Posts: 1,076 | Thanked: 176 times | Joined on Mar 2007
#1
Ummmm....7 hours on a 3ghz machine? Can we get this technology on a tablet please!!
 
Benson's Avatar
Benson is offline Benson
2009-01-06 , 19:05
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#2
For anyone else who wasn't tracking Applefest....

The machine in question is a 17" MBP.

And I'm sure we can get that tech on a 17" tablet. But I'm much less sure I want it. Big laptops can afford big batteries. (Also, expensive laptops can afford low-voltage binned CPUs and such. I don't think I want Apple pricing on my next tablet, either.)
__________________
World's first inductively-charged N900!
 
sondjata's Avatar
sondjata is offline sondjata
2009-01-06 , 19:13
Posts: 1,076 | Thanked: 176 times | Joined on Mar 2007
#3
Lol Benson. It's not the size of the battery or the tablet, it's about the tech. If it's as new as it seems (particularly the ability to charge specific cells within a battery) and adds to battery life, why not? Even if it pushed the usable time (at least for me) to a full 8 hours (I've never gone that long on a single charge while actively using the tablet especially if the cpu gets pegged by the RSS reader) I'd be all for it.
 
Benson's Avatar
Benson is offline Benson
2009-01-06 , 19:50
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#4
Originally Posted by sondjata View Post
Lol Benson. It's not the size of the battery or the tablet, it's about the tech. If it's as new as it seems (particularly the ability to charge specific cells within a battery) and adds to battery life, why not? Even if it pushed the usable time (at least for me) to a full 8 hours (I've never gone that long on a single charge while actively using the tablet especially if the cpu gets pegged by the RSS reader) I'd be all for it.
Awesome. They fixed an inherent disadvantage of multicell batteries -- they should be approaching the usable energy density of single-cell batteries like the one you're using. I honestly don't know how much of an advancement it is over "normal" laptop batteries, but I do know that the differences are mostly non-applicable to tablets, and I seriously suspect the battery is abnormally large; since the screen determines overall size, and electronics are historically easier to shrink than batteries, it only makes sense.

And if you want 8 hours, go for a Mugen 3.6 A h -- it does get that life in my N800.
__________________
World's first inductively-charged N900!
 
sondjata's Avatar
sondjata is offline sondjata
2009-01-06 , 21:11
Posts: 1,076 | Thanked: 176 times | Joined on Mar 2007
#5
Well I suppose we'll see but the claim is that the laptop is no heavier or otherwise dimensionally changed so it implies that the battery dimension size is the same as it was on the previous (current?) generation 17". So if that's the case then I would like a same size battery as the current one in my N800 with more life. Apparently it can be done?
 
tso's Avatar
tso is offline tso
2009-01-07 , 00:06
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#6
i suspect its the same battey tech that HP recently announced they would start to use.

got to say tho, i love how apple justified not having a removable battery...
 
wazd's Avatar
wazd is offline wazd
2009-01-07 , 00:27
Posts: 528 | Thanked: 895 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Moscow, Russia
#7
Battery life is added just by filling all free space with battery. Super-high-tech indeed I'd prefer to have smaller battery, but removable.
__________________
Maemo UI improvements blog.
 
qole's Avatar
qole is offline qole
2009-01-07 , 00:37
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#8
Originally Posted by sondjata View Post
Even if it pushed the usable time (at least for me) to a full 8 hours (I've never gone that long on a single charge while actively using the tablet especially if the cpu gets pegged by the RSS reader) I'd be all for it.
My goodness. I've never managed to "actively use" the tablet for anything approaching 8 hours solid, although I've come close, while using it with Maemo Mapper to track my route through the backcountry. The battery was fine. But the screen was off for most of that time.

I also used the tablet for many hours in a row (4 or 5?) while on a plane to Europe. I needed to use an external 4AA battery pack to supplement the tablet's battery in that case, since I had the screen on the whole time...
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 
Johnx's Avatar
Johnx is offline Johnx
2009-01-07 , 14:47
Posts: 643 | Thanked: 628 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Seattle (or thereabouts)
#9
Originally Posted by sondjata View Post
Well I suppose we'll see but the claim is that the laptop is no heavier or otherwise dimensionally changed so it implies that the battery dimension size is the same as it was on the previous (current?) generation 17". So if that's the case then I would like a same size battery as the current one in my N800 with more life. Apparently it can be done?
That claim doesn't follow. The mainboard for the new laptop is almost certainly smaller. They do have diagrams of how much space the battery cells takes up, which is quite considerable really.
 
nilchak is offline nilchak
2009-01-07 , 22:06
Posts: 1,097 | Thanked: 650 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#10
Its just like when Apple spun the iPod Shuffle's lack of playlist support as a great feature. Music in shuffle mode was the new cool.

Now Apple does the same with lack of removable batteries on laptops as the new cool - cause it gives you better battery life.

All ye Apple suckers !
 
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top