The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post: | ||
Andre Klapper, attila77, dread123, evad, fatalsaint, frals, jukey, noobmonkey, sachin007, Sasler, tissot, ukki |
![]() |
2010-02-11
, 23:30
|
|
Posts: 1,070 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#2
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 15:33
|
Posts: 434 |
Thanked: 325 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#3
|
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 15:44
|
|
Posts: 529 |
Thanked: 262 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
@ Eastleigh, Hampshire, UK
|
#4
|
Can I have two different versions of the same app in Extras-testing at the same time? If possible, is it recommended?
The reason I'm asking is that I have a version in Extras-testing, which is only a minor update compared to the version in Extras. It already has enough votes. I just need to wait for the quarantine time to end before I can promote it.
But now I made a new version which has pretty major changes in Extras-devel. While I tested as well as I can by myself, I need feedback. However, I can't seem to get enough of tester in Extras-devel, so I though of promoting it to Extras-testing for having more people testing it. Is this recommended?
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 15:53
|
Posts: 323 |
Thanked: 118 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Australia
|
#5
|
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 16:29
|
|
Posts: 1,070 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#6
|
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 16:32
|
|
Posts: 1,070 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#7
|
From my experience promoting one version to extras-testing appears to 'unpromote' the verison that was there, or something like that. So I don't think you can co-exist two versions.
The Following User Says Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 16:44
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#8
|
Will be when all the rules for these apps are decided and in place(should be soon).
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 16:50
|
|
Posts: 1,070 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#9
|
Would that include GUI apps that depend on other command line apps?
Take Bratag's and my Pianobar front-ends... pianobar is a command line app that would be exempted from your testing.. but the GUI's wouldn't be.. but if I understand the current system properly: if either of our GUI apps gets tested and voted up.. then when we promote it drags the dependencies too (since it's assumed that if an app that depends on another app worked fine.. then the other must have as well)..
The Following User Says Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 17:35
|
Posts: 434 |
Thanked: 325 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#10
|
Exactly, you can't have apps with the same name in testing, unless there's some bug in the system.
If the version currently in -testing is just a small fix why not promote the version in -devel now ?
The Following User Says Thank You to Sasler For This Useful Post: | ||
Originally posted at the Testing Squad mailing list.
Valério Valério
www.valeriovalerio.org