|
2009-06-26
, 15:34
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#2
|
![]() |
2009-06-26
, 16:05
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#3
|
![]() |
2009-06-26
, 16:21
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#4
|
![]() |
2009-06-26
, 16:22
|
|
Posts: 819 |
Thanked: 806 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ Oxnard, Ca.
|
#5
|
5) motion-generated power, as in self-winding watches (only with a kinetic-to-electric conversion). I am surprised that this hasn't been explored (unless I've missed it).
![]() |
2009-06-26
, 17:23
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#6
|
![]() |
2009-06-26
, 20:00
|
Posts: 226 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Poland / Bialystok
|
#7
|
![]() |
2009-06-26
, 23:26
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#8
|
The most efficient way theese days is thermal harvesting - it can power a watch for example - but it requires carrying device "on skin" with top not covered - to achieve maximum temperature difference.
The easiest solution is solar panel on the back.
Unfortunately it's quite rare in production devices - I don't know why (I use solar powered FM radio and it works ok).
![]() |
2009-06-27
, 03:27
|
|
Posts: 819 |
Thanked: 806 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ Oxnard, Ca.
|
#9
|
The right term is "power harvesting".
Unfortunately rf-collection is very inefficient.
Buttons - just forget it since You'd have to make Your keys harder than usuall and let's face it - browsing the web equals very low keyboard usage.
The most efficient way theese days is thermal harvesting - it can power a watch for example - but it requires carrying device "on skin" with top not covered - to achieve maximum temperature difference.
The easiest solution is solar panel on the back.
Unfortunately it's quite rare in production devices - I don't know why (I use solar powered FM radio and it works ok).
![]() |
2009-06-27
, 05:16
|
Posts: 226 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Poland / Bialystok
|
#10
|
I think they are.
If Nokia were able to embed small energy generation devices into their upcoming tablets that had enough power to keep the battery charged always or even "almost always" then they would be an almost irresistible choice over the competition not counting the software side of it.
These energy generating technologies do exist now but up until now their one main disadvantage is that they all produced too little current. Too little to charge a battery and compensate for any leakage their circuits might incur.
But now that has all changed because of a new thin film battery/capacitor product and accompanying low leakage circuits which accepts any current level as long as the Voltage is correct.
The product is called Thinergy
made by http://www.infinitepowersolutions.com/
see engineering tv video link on this page http://www.infinitepowersolutions.com/product
video will disappear if you click anywhere on the page. I don't know why.
The four ways that Immediately come to my mind that Nokia could generate energy in a Nokia tablet would be.
1) www.litroenergy.com
A multi layered sandwich strip of thin film solar panels with their glowpaint in between.
2) www.M2Epower.com
3) Nokias recently announced ambient EM waves collection project.
http://www.symbian-freak.com/news/00...be_charged.htm
4) Piezoelectric power from when we press down on the keypad buttons providing.
example http://www.artificialmuscle.com/products
All of these with the exception of litroenergy probably (because they can just keep adding more layers) fall below the necessary current necessary to charge a tablets battery so why not have all four of these methods embedded into a tablet and each have its own thinergy cell to save up the charge and then send it to a central customized large thinergy made by the same company and then have this zap the Nokia battery at regular intervals.
Last edited by aironeous; 2009-06-27 at 03:29.