Active Topics

 


Closed Thread
Thread Tools
PradaBrada's Avatar
Posts: 294 | Thanked: 240 times | Joined on May 2010
#1
Even RIM (super-looser) can make a phone that Nokia took 3 years to create (Samsung took a weak or less HAHAHAHAHAHA)...and that ******** called Symbian^3 (amateur copy from Maemo) is not complete yet

I'm sure now...Nokia is a referece from the "Lion of Oz"...the king with a long blond hair who run and shake like a girl

LG the newest member of "top-level-group" (HTC, Apple, Samsung, Palm) can use pure Android + WP7 transformed...better putting even LG > Nokia
 
Posts: 3,664 | Thanked: 1,530 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Hamilton, New Zealand
#2
Are you sure less than a week to make a phone? OS alone takes years of preparation and testing, let alone the hardware testing and combined with real life testing on the device before finalising the product.

1 week is impossible, 1year is plausable.

I don't know where you got that facts of your from.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to maxximuscool For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#3
Prada, that's enough forum pollution.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
ste-phan's Avatar
Posts: 1,197 | Thanked: 2,710 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Hanoi
#4
Is Jesus aware of the battery staying power this piece of crap delivers?
Symbian^3 can use some updates (what's new) but it sure outclasses bling bling smartphones on N8 with it's crappy 680 something processor.
To deliver the top end multimedia performance when you ask it to do so. Not even running hot.

If you lack the imagination to put a device to good use, it does not mean it is not useful.
 
Posts: 1,097 | Thanked: 650 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#5
Oh my, another squealing troll who 'run and shake like a girl' :-).
(admit : I dont even know what was that supposed to mean ?)

Now Prada , did you use this new 'amateur copy from Maemo' yourself and come to this decision ?

And I gave up with the LG statement... Something to do with some transformations and some math about LG and Nokia. Come on whatever happened to understandable English anymore ?
If you want to convey something, either a reference URL to some reference topic helps, or some understandable statement helps , not some gibberish in the midst of your squealing rant.

Can you provide some Reference points to that outlandish half gibberish, half statement? I really would like to know about Symbian^3.
 
PradaBrada's Avatar
Posts: 294 | Thanked: 240 times | Joined on May 2010
#6
Damn i forget that Motorola is a top level too!!!

about Nokia and LG, LG can use WP7 + Android since he can use raw hardware mixed with OS element...Nokia can't since he is a looser

the touch screen theory was already out that time, and with that Nokia took 3 years to create an incomplete OS (Samsung took 1 weak with the same information stolen from Apple)

Samsung can use that module from CES2008 that looks like a pico projector, and i have a GIANT suspect that HTC can projector too

my point is...Nokia is a fail & Symbian = ****
 
Posts: 92 | Thanked: 134 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Europe
#7
Prada, your english is almost as poor as your reasoning or factual knowledge. Its funny, but not in the way you want it to be funny.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to NOMOS For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#8
Trolling. Thread closed.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:13.