|
2011-05-30
, 12:40
|
|
Posts: 434 |
Thanked: 990 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Australia
|
#2
|
|
2011-05-30
, 12:44
|
|
Posts: 1,885 |
Thanked: 2,008 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ OVI MAPS
|
#3
|
The Following User Says Thank You to NvyUs For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-30
, 13:10
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#4
|
|
2011-05-30
, 13:24
|
|
Posts: 1,885 |
Thanked: 2,008 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ OVI MAPS
|
#5
|
|
2011-05-30
, 22:52
|
Posts: 364 |
Thanked: 128 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Australia
|
#8
|
|
2011-05-30
, 22:57
|
Banned |
Posts: 726 |
Thanked: 497 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Gravesend, UK
|
#9
|
I'd choose S60 3rd FP2 any day.
S60 5th and after -- all sucked hard. It's like they were really shoehorned into the touch devices.
S60 5th should've never existed. It was terrible. Symbian^3 is what S60 5th should've been. You think Nokia would've caught on by then after the wild success of the iPhone.
Symbian Anna -- new theme, updated apps, new icons that have pretty bad contrast. Other than that, you can probably expect the usual S^3 fanfare.
Too bad S^4 never happened. Looked great on paper, lots of eye candy, pretty much an all new Symbian UI with the same great core.
there is a new phone coming to Australia soon
http://www.nokia.com.au/find-product...specifications
Question is , is Anna better than other Symbian version?