Active Topics
-
maemo.org (1)
to Community by sixwheeledbeast - 23 mins ago -
Old stuff for Nokia 770 (0)
to Nokia 770 by teroyk - 4 hrs, 20 mins ago - more...
|
2011-06-02
, 05:36
|
|
Posts: 2,225 |
Thanked: 3,822 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Florida
|
#22
|
Originally Posted by laasonen
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "sleep 1s" instead of "sleep 1"? What are you referring to?
Thanks.
You or someone seem to have typed "sleep 1s" instead of "sleep 1" somewhere :/
 |
|
2011-06-02
, 06:07
|
|
Posts: 565 |
Thanked: 618 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Finland
|
#23
|
Originally Posted by Mentalist Traceur
This error:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "sleep 1s" instead of "sleep 1"? What are you referring to?
Code:
Nokia-N900:~# airmon-ng start wlan0 Interface Chipset Driver wlan0 TI WL1251 wl12xx - [phy0]sleep: invalid number '1s' (monitor mode enabled on mon0) Nokia-N900:~#
|
|
2011-06-02
, 06:14
|
|
Posts: 2,225 |
Thanked: 3,822 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Florida
|
#24
|
Oh, that. I don't know what that's about, and mine gives me the same error all the time, but notice the part where it says "(monitor mode enabled on mon0)"? That means it worked. If you run iwconfig or ifconfig you will now see a mon0 interface in monitor mode.
|
|
2011-06-02
, 06:16
|
|
Posts: 565 |
Thanked: 618 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Finland
|
#25
|
Originally Posted by Mentalist Traceur
Yes, I have been using it over hour now without problems
Oh, that. I don't know what that's about, and mine gives me the same error all the time, but notice the part where it says "(monitor mode enabled on mon0)"? That means it worked. If you run iwconfig or ifconfig you will now see a mon0 interface in monitor mode.
 |
|
2011-06-02
, 06:21
|
|
Posts: 76 |
Thanked: 87 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Scotland
|
#26
|
It's definitely summer, the script kiddies are out from school.
__________________
Pirate Party UK - www.pirateparty.org.uk
Pirate Party UK - www.pirateparty.org.uk
| The Following User Says Thank You to ScottishDuck For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2011-06-02
, 08:26
|
|
Posts: 549 |
Thanked: 299 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Australian in the Philippines
|
#27
|
Originally Posted by karam
A punch in the mouth is sometimes funny to see as well, what you are doing is called "denial of service" - most countries have laws covering exactly this type of activity. You disrupt other users of a system that you don't even own - Why?
Correct i saw it funny cause i use mitm a lot
and using it to cut users off is funny for me
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dchky For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-06-02
, 08:36
|
|
Posts: 565 |
Thanked: 618 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Finland
|
#28
|
Originally Posted by dchky
Blocking file sharers from public wlans when they are jamming the whole station would be useful
A punch in the mouth is sometimes funny to see as well, what you are doing is called "denial of service" - most countries have laws covering exactly this type of activity. You disrupt other users of a system that you don't even own - Why?
Not not necessarily legal, but what are you going to 
|
|
2011-06-02
, 08:57
|
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#30
|
In my uni in Thailand, this would also be useful for kicking out users who suck up the bandwidth with their downloads. They screw things for the rest of us.
Peoples concepts of illegality are classified in psychology. Don't because they say so is one step up from I can do it because I have the power. A real healthy approach would be understanding the functions a law serves, and following the law based on our perception of the function that the law is serving.
The European union just banned mint, with a whole bunch of other medicinal plants. The ban originated from business interests, which is the function that the ban serves. If you disagree with the function, it is better to ignore one law, then to loose trust in the concept of law and community at a larger scale.
These issues are based on the social contract, a concept people would do well to relearn.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Social_Contract
Peoples concepts of illegality are classified in psychology. Don't because they say so is one step up from I can do it because I have the power. A real healthy approach would be understanding the functions a law serves, and following the law based on our perception of the function that the law is serving.
The European union just banned mint, with a whole bunch of other medicinal plants. The ban originated from business interests, which is the function that the ban serves. If you disagree with the function, it is better to ignore one law, then to loose trust in the concept of law and community at a larger scale.
These issues are based on the social contract, a concept people would do well to relearn.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Social_Contract
 |
| Tags |
| hacking, hax!! *monitor*, no harm done, script kiddies, spoon fed |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:04.
You or someone seem to have typed "sleep 1s" instead of "sleep 1" somewhere :/