The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-07-13
, 19:25
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#72
|
![]() |
2011-07-13
, 19:46
|
Posts: 242 |
Thanked: 269 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#73
|
I'm still fine doing that, and actually like having the cellular radio on a separate battery, so the real computer is still functional even if the connectivity is out of juice. I admit I don't need cellular voice at all though.
May I point you to: It is not a cell phone -- and it is good
I found a huge difference. Priority was given to making it "finger friendly" and "optimised for one-handed use" to the detriment of everything else. Input methods in particular were completely massacred to accommodate this. Then there's "kinetic" scrolling versus scrollbars, the way many apps / widgets stopped showing a lot of relevant information in order to make all remaining UI elements "thumbable" (which raises the question, what's the 800x480 resolution for?) etc.
The other side of this is the hardware, An N8x0 might be a bit large to hold to your ear, but I found the N900's screen way too small to use comfortably (and the size made all of the above worse). And the third side is that that little radio tends to turn everyone into control freaks. If putting a cellular modem into the N900 means the user has to put up with cherry or the SIM deciding which wifi channels can be seen, I'd rather not have it thank you very much.
![]() |
2011-07-13
, 20:01
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#74
|
![]() |
2011-07-13
, 20:17
|
|
Posts: 738 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#75
|
![]() |
2011-07-13
, 21:01
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#76
|
Silence. You're the one thanking folks that agree that it wasn't supposed to sell millions.
I bet the board of directors liked that idea too.
![]() |
2011-07-13
, 22:02
|
Posts: 673 |
Thanked: 856 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
|
#77
|
no they didn't indeed.
alas
but as erendorn pointed out, there are economic factors more complicated then mere "economies of scales" involved in selling a product.
and supply versus demand isn't just a matter of lowering the price (or making buyers willing to pay a higher price) neither.
even though until recently the mere fact of having NOKIA written on it was premium enough to warrant one >¦-)
neither Maemo and not even MeeGo are (or ever were) ready for consumers.
like it or not
NOKIA's management may have been an indecisive bunch but they would have pushed the MIDs out to the masses (just like they did push the 7710) if they had the feeling they were ready.
actually they did, but the mere fact the none of the N900's predecessors had a SIM made them unattractive. not only to consumers but also to providers, as it wasn't possible to milk the customers on their broadband consumption.
i would have bought a 770 (instead of a 7710) and a N8x0 (instead of the N95) if they had had one and i'm sure many of the 9000 series aficionados would have made the step too.
trying to argue that having a MID in one pocket and a dumb phone in the other is the solution is total rubbish; a MID without SIM is useless to ppl minimally on the move
when the N900 came out, i made the step, but many former 9000 fans had switched to other smart phones by then
The Following User Says Thank You to momcilo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-07-13
, 22:17
|
|
Posts: 1,187 |
Thanked: 816 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Australia
|
#78
|
![]() |
2011-07-13
, 22:31
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#79
|
Another personal reason: I like having two separate devices. One that will act always as phone (dumb!), another to handle more demanding tasks. I can accept the fact that the second one will discharge the battery within one or two days of use, but having to charge a cell phone each and every day is not very practical. Yeah, I now bring another battery, in fact how about pocket-size nuclear reactor?
The Following User Says Thank You to qwazix For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-07-13
, 23:09
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#80
|
Another personal reason: I like having two separate devices. One that will act always as phone (dumb!), another to handle more demanding tasks. I can accept the fact that the second one will discharge the battery within one or two days of use, but having to charge a cell phone each and every day is not very practical. Yeah, I now bring another battery, in fact how about pocket-size nuclear reactor?
![]() |
Tags |
bada rox, goodbye nokia, mantis boy, n9 rox, success: sold 7 |
Thread Tools | |
|
If selling something is an activity that you don't want to engage, then you don't release it then. Selling is an activity that any business that wants to sell an item and make money from it. The development, support, et al costs money, but last I checked, Nokia knows how to make money from selling hardware.
And why have rhetoric that you intend on it becoming a consumer device if you never wanted any iteration of it before the final step 5 of 5 to be sold in millions.
Makes no ****ing sense. It's that kind of mentality that's driven the stock prices down, made this website more of a cult than niche and ultimately has sealed the destiny of the N9 - it'll sell only as well, if not slightly better than any iteration before it. And that's not enough to save it.
So yeah... continue to think that it not selling in millions was "smart" or the right way to go. Come back next year when you see those decisions affect this site, other developers and how it's driven the Nokia stock to a new low.
Seriously... makes no sense. Stupidest thing I've read all day.
****ed up management, ****ed up mentality around how you should/shouldn't sell something, ****ed up mentality of the users.
Seriously ****ed up.