The Following User Says Thank You to ndi For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-05
, 22:55
|
Posts: 292 |
Thanked: 131 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#22
|
|
2010-09-05
, 23:00
|
Posts: 80 |
Thanked: 45 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#23
|
|
2010-09-06
, 01:46
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#24
|
|
2010-09-12
, 10:08
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on May 2010
|
#25
|
|
2010-09-12
, 18:22
|
|
Posts: 635 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Black Mesa Research Facility
|
#26
|
|
2011-09-29
, 10:27
|
Posts: 3 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Czech republic
|
#27
|
The Following User Says Thank You to geckon For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
backgroumd, link, microb, window |
Thread Tools | |
|
This, however, was meant to be a hack-into-it implementation, not a microb-update implementation. My "it's gonna be slow" was meant for quickly implementing a key that makes the browser jump.
If they implement in browser natively, the N900 can indeed handle it with almost-zero overhead.
I also said that re-rendering takes as long as forward and back. I was thinking of re-rendering the PAGE not the view, for some reason. Meh.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.