Active Topics
corsac |
2011-11-03
, 13:02
|
|
Posts: 94 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#101
|
Originally Posted by corsac
Ok, it seems to have correctly worked, the device is back to functional state, I guess I'll wait a bit more before retrying developer mode.
|
|
2011-11-03
, 13:16
|
|
Posts: 496 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ London
|
#102
|
Originally Posted by corsac
That's exactly what happened to me (coincidental with me enabling Developer Mode). Well, one of the things.
Ok, so in fact I didn't yet enable developer mode. I tried to do it, it downloaded some apps, then rebooted, but entered a reboot loop, ending with:
Device is malfunctioning
You may try re-flashing the software.
then
Software problem (dnsmasq): too many reboots
| The Following User Says Thank You to strongm For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-11-03
, 13:17
|
|
Posts: 94 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#103
|
Originally Posted by strongm
How did you fix? Reflashing?
That's exactly what happened to me (coincidental with me enabling Developer Mode). Well, one of the things.
|
|
2011-11-03
, 13:21
|
|
Posts: 496 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ London
|
#104
|
Originally Posted by corsac
Yes*, and I provided links earlier in this thread on how I did that, and what tools I used. Given your earlier comments about trying to get hold of a legitimate image, I'd advise the compeltely legitimate Navifirm tool I provided links for.
How did you fix? Reflashing?
*Not really fixed. Just managed to bring the handset back to life - but with all the same problems (crashes, reboots, frozen apps, apps not launching) that I'd previously been experiencing still there.
I have now contacted Handtec to organise a replacement (hopefully - looks like I've got at least one more hurdle to jump: convincing the returns desk this is a real fault)
| The Following User Says Thank You to strongm For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-11-03
, 13:22
|
|
Posts: 306 |
Thanked: 106 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#105
|
Originally Posted by the_Wildgoose
Sorry to be OT but how well is N9 working asterisk server? Any choppy calls similar to N900?
I have setup the Nokia link, imap email account with "always up to date" set, a SIP phone account to my asterisk server and Skype.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
Voice choppy on sip calls
Please vote for bug number 10388
------------------------------------------------------------------
Voice choppy on sip calls
Please vote for bug number 10388
|
|
2011-11-03
, 18:26
|
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Amsterdam
|
#106
|
Hi all,
I had numerous (3 or 4) crashed of applications today. Mostly the webbrowser since I was using that a lot.
Also 1 reboot.
Now I looked in dmesg and I found a "SGX Hardware Recovery triggered" message.
I had another application crash and the same message appeared.
Can anybody else confirm this ?
I had numerous (3 or 4) crashed of applications today. Mostly the webbrowser since I was using that a lot.
Also 1 reboot.
Now I looked in dmesg and I found a "SGX Hardware Recovery triggered" message.
Code:
[11461.732604] SGX Hardware Recovery triggered (from SGX_MISRHandler) [11461.732696] PID = 2856, process name = fenix [11461.732727] EVENT_STATUS = 0x20000000 [11461.732727] EVENT_STATUS2 = 0x00000008 [11461.732727] BIF_CTRL = 0x00000000 [11461.732727] BIF_INT_STAT = 0x00000000 [11461.732727] BIF_MEM_REQ_STAT = 0x00000000 [11461.732727] BIF_FAULT = 0x00000000 [11461.732757] CLKGATECTL = 0x00222220 [11461.732757] Last SGX microkernel status code: 0xad00009a ... ... ... [11461.757171] [11461.295318] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757171] syn addr:0d407738 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757171] [11461.296142] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757171] syn addr:0d400d80 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757171] [11461.296325] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757171] syn addr:0d400d08 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757202] [11461.296386] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757202] syn addr:0d400d38 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757202] [11461.296661] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757202] syn addr:0d405270 rop/c: 12/ 12 wop/c: 106/ 106 [11461.757202] [11461.296752] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757232] syn addr:0d400d50 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757232] [11461.296844] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757232] syn addr:0d400d68 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757232] [11461.297027] fenix[2856]: sgx_kick [11461.757232] ctx 0f18c5c0 [11461.757232] [11461.307586] Xorg[52 [11461.757537] [11461.351440] Xorg[529]: sgx_qblt_synreq [11461.757568] syn addr:0d400048 rop/c: 21/ 21 wop/c: 3767/ 3766 [11461.757568] [11461.359832] Xorg[529]: sgx_qblt_syn_comp [11461.757568] syn addr:0d400048 rop/c: 21/ 21 wop/c: 3767/ 3767 [11461.757568] [11461.359924] Xorg[529]: sgx_qblt_update [11461.757568] [11461.359985] Xorg[529]: sgx_qblt_update_comp [11461.757568] [11461.408966] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757598] syn addr:0d404498 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757598] [11461.409118] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757598] syn addr:0d404498 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757598] [11461.409179] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757598] syn addr:0d404498 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757629] [11461.409210] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757629] syn addr:0d404498 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757629] [11461.409393] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757629] syn addr:0d405b58 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757629] [11461.410797] fenix[2856]: sgx_first_kick [11461.757629] dst_syn addr:0d400018 rop/c: 31/ 31 wop/c: 3767 [11461.757934] [11461.449829] Xorg[529]: sgx_tfer_kick [11461.757934] src_syn addr:0d400b40 rop/c: 107/ 106 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757934] dst_syn addr:0d405270 rop/c: 12/ 12 wop/c: 107/ 106 [11461.757965] ctx 0f009870 [11461.757965] [11461.491210] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757965] syn addr:0d405b58 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757965] [11461.491821] fenix[2856]: sgx_kick [11461.757965] ctx 0f18c5c0 [11461.757965] [11461.492797] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757995] syn addr:0d407660 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757995] [11461.493621] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757995] syn addr:0d406558 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.757995] [11461.493927] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.757995] syn addr:0d405a20 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.758026] [11461.493988] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758026] syn addr:0d405a38 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.758026] [11461.497100] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758026] syn addr:0d407738 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.758026] [11461.497436] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758026] syn [11461.758331] [11461.601531] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758331] syn addr:0d400c18 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.758331] [11461.601776] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758361] syn addr:0d405ba0 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.758361] [11461.601898] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758361] syn addr:0d405bb8 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.758361] [11461.601989] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758361] syn addr:0d405bd0 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.758392] [11461.602203] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758392] syn addr:0d400d08 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.758392] [11461.602264] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758392] syn addr:0d400d38 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.758392] [11461.602539] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758392] syn addr:0d405270 rop/c: 12/ 12 wop/c: 107/ 107 [11461.758422] [11461.602661] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758422] syn addr:0d400d50 rop/c: 0/ 0 wop/c: 0/ 0 [11461.758422] [11461.602752] fenix[2856]: sgx_qblt_synchk [11461.758422] syn addr:0d400d68 rop/c: [11461.758453] [11461.710662] Xorg[529]: sgx_qblt_synreq [11461.758453] syn addr:0d400018 rop/c: 31/ 31 wop/c: 3768/ 3767 [11461.758483] [11461.710662] Xorg[529]: sgx_qblt_synreq [11461.758483] syn addr:0d400018 rop/c: 31/ 31 wop/c: 3768/ 3767 [11461.758514] HW Recovery dump generated at 1320343799113449 [11461.799926] Dumping 2 render state buffers
Can anybody else confirm this ?
|
|
2011-11-03
, 18:58
|
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Amsterdam
|
#107
|
http://discussions.europe.nokia.com/...s/td-p/1192015 confirms my experience.
It raises the very interesting question of:
Is nokia (or for us Handtec) working on this issue ?
Would be nice to have an official confirmation and note instead of only 'you can send it back'.
It raises the very interesting question of:
Is nokia (or for us Handtec) working on this issue ?
Would be nice to have an official confirmation and note instead of only 'you can send it back'.
 |
|
2011-11-03
, 20:28
|
|
Posts: 284 |
Thanked: 80 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ London, UK
|
#108
|
FWIW, I tried flashing UK/Ireland, failed to initiate flashing with a particular error (forgot to note, soz!).
I also tried flashing original, but with --erase-mmc=secure switch in the hope this would resolve any file system corruption. No change.
Would the above recreated the swap partition too?
Attempting to address any potential software issues.
I also tried flashing original, but with --erase-mmc=secure switch in the hope this would resolve any file system corruption. No change.
Would the above recreated the swap partition too?
Attempting to address any potential software issues.
|
|
2011-11-03
, 20:37
|
|
Posts: 303 |
Thanked: 175 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ London UK
|
#109
|
I'm having real issues figuring out what happens when app crash.. strace is practically useless since Aegis protects all the nokia stock apps from ptrace tracking.. grrr.. I just want to know if it BUS/SEGV/ILL at this stage..
I think Austria got a very bad batch.. I think this might be enough to take a case to Nokia at least make european support aware that "reflashing and sending back" is unlikely to solve the problem and that faulty austrian handsets definitely need a very careful test
I'll see if I can find a sympathetic Nokia employee
I think Austria got a very bad batch.. I think this might be enough to take a case to Nokia at least make european support aware that "reflashing and sending back" is unlikely to solve the problem and that faulty austrian handsets definitely need a very careful test
I'll see if I can find a sympathetic Nokia employee
|
|
2011-11-03
, 20:41
|
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Amsterdam
|
#110
|
Originally Posted by cpitchford
Yes I agree completely. I submitted a support question at Handtec about this. But it might indeed be wiser to go directly to Nokia.
I think Austria got a very bad batch.. I think this might be enough to take a case to Nokia at least make european support aware that "reflashing and sending back" is unlikely to solve the problem and that faulty austrian handsets definitely need a very careful test
I'll see if I can find a sympathetic Nokia employee
Shouldn't be too hard for them to order a recall and replace all the units with proper onces...
| The Following User Says Thank You to trbs For This Useful Post: | ||
