![]() |
2012-01-22
, 05:12
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 57 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Rotterdam, port to Europe !
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to eerde For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-01-22
, 16:24
|
Posts: 162 |
Thanked: 91 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ poor Slovenia
|
#3
|
![]() |
2012-01-23
, 03:22
|
Posts: 173 |
Thanked: 83 times |
Joined on Dec 2011
|
#4
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nokiac For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-04-09
, 14:03
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 235 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Manila
|
#5
|
Vibrate is only really useful when the handset is connected to your body but not directly visible - so what if it was possible to switch the vibration on and off depending on the state of the proximity sensor (top right of screen)? I've noticed how this (rather cleverly) is used to switch off the standby screen; what if the inverse could be done with the vibration?
Not only would this eliminate the risk of your phone acting like a lemming (yes, I know, but the analogy seems to have stuck) - you'd also be spared the annoying rattle it makes even when remaining safe, leaving you free to enjoy the soothing notes of your favourite ringtone undisturbed. I dunno. There's also something undignified about a mobile helplessly buzzing around while vainly vying for our attention. Not very Zen.
Anyone agree?