Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 307 | Thanked: 488 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ USA around Chicago
#11
Bug 1044 is not exactly this issue.

I am having the same problem since 1.2 and I opened a new bug
https://harmattan-bugs.nokia.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056

Please vote/report your findings. This we need a work around or fix as soon as possible.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to abyzthomas For This Useful Post:
Posts: 30 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#12
i hope this help ,,after searching here and over forum.meego.org
devel-su
password
ls /etc/apt/sources.list.d
rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/filemanager.list
restart then
devel-su
password
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mike_shenoda For This Useful Post:
Posts: 92 | Thanked: 16 times | Joined on Jun 2011 @ Sacramento, CA USA
#13
Originally Posted by mike_shenoda View Post
i hope this help ,,after searching here and over forum.meego.org
devel-su
password
ls /etc/apt/sources.list.d
rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/filemanager.list
restart then
devel-su
password
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
you are my hero
 
Posts: 92 | Thanked: 16 times | Joined on Jun 2011 @ Sacramento, CA USA
#14
So...I was able to update...but when trying to upgrade

~ # apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libgpg-error0 libpixman-1-0
The following packages will be upgraded:
nano
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and2 not upgraded.
Need to get 580kB of archives.
After this operation, 106kB of additional diskspace will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
nano
Install these packages without verification [y/N]? y
Get:1 http://repo.pub.meego.com ./ nano 2.2.6-1 [580kB]
Fetched 580kB in 21s (27.1kB/s)
Aegis rejecting /var/cache/apt/archives/nano_2.2.6-1_armel.deb: package 'nano' already installed from 'com.nokia.maemo' -- not replacing it from unknown origin
aegis aborting dpkg -- all listed package files rejected
Compilation failed in require.
Updating desktop entries... Done
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an errorcode (255)
~ #


If nano was already installed and up-to-date, why did it detect a upgrade..?

Last edited by vzp916; 2012-03-01 at 21:27.
 
Posts: 10 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Feb 2012
#15
Originally Posted by mike_shenoda View Post
i hope this help ,,after searching here and over forum.meego.org
devel-su
password
ls /etc/apt/sources.list.d
rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/filemanager.list
restart then
devel-su
password
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
I had the same bad .list in the repos but I didnt do the "apt-get upgrade". I would be careful with "apt-get upgrade" since that actually changes your system.
 
Posts: 92 | Thanked: 16 times | Joined on Jun 2011 @ Sacramento, CA USA
#16
Originally Posted by mikee805 View Post
I had the same bad .list in the repos but I didnt do the "apt-get upgrade". I would be careful with "apt-get upgrade" since that actually changes your system.
Be careful with apt-get dist-upgrade

the other one is good for you
 
Posts: 10 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Feb 2012
#17
Originally Posted by vzp916 View Post
Be careful with apt-get dist-upgrade

the other one is good for you
dist-upgrade is closer to "you probably shouldnt be doing that" upgrade can break things too (but shouldnt) since you are changing the software installed on your system even if you dont need to. Just a warning.
 
Posts: 92 | Thanked: 16 times | Joined on Jun 2011 @ Sacramento, CA USA
#18
Originally Posted by mikee805 View Post
dist-upgrade is closer to "you probably shouldnt be doing that" upgrade can break things too (but shouldnt) since you are changing the software installed on your system even if you dont need to. Just a warning.
You may be right, for I'm no expert...but when I was waiting for PR1.2 OTA upgrade (before it was available on NaviFirm)

I went to Settings>Applications> Manage Applications> Update and had a bunch of stuff there to update (Store, Link) but no PR1.2

so when I ran command ap-get upgrade it installed all the ones that were in my Update screen.....

So I'm wondering if thats all it ever does, is upgrade installed apps
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#19
Originally Posted by vzp916 View Post
So...I was able to update...but when trying to upgrade

~ # apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libgpg-error0 libpixman-1-0
The following packages will be upgraded:
nano
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and2 not upgraded.
Need to get 580kB of archives.
After this operation, 106kB of additional diskspace will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
nano
Install these packages without verification [y/N]? y
Get:1 http://repo.pub.meego.com ./ nano 2.2.6-1 [580kB]
Fetched 580kB in 21s (27.1kB/s)
Aegis rejecting /var/cache/apt/archives/nano_2.2.6-1_armel.deb: package 'nano' already installed from 'com.nokia.maemo' -- not replacing it from unknown origin
aegis aborting dpkg -- all listed package files rejected
Compilation failed in require.
Updating desktop entries... Done
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an errorcode (255)
~ #


If nano was already installed and up-to-date, why did it detect a upgrade..?
its being reject rom the repo repo.pub.meego.combecause you have already installed it from com.nokia.maemo (probably OVI, and first one probably meego.
Two different sources, same app.
 
Posts: 10 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Feb 2012
#20
Originally Posted by vzp916 View Post
You may be right, for I'm no expert...but when I was waiting for PR1.2 OTA upgrade (before it was available on NaviFirm)

I went to Settings>Applications> Manage Applications> Update and had a bunch of stuff there to update (Store, Link) but no PR1.2

so when I ran command ap-get upgrade it installed all the ones that were in my Update screen.....

So I'm wondering if thats all it ever does, is upgrade installed apps
Correst but not just apps underlying libraries and drivers could also be upgraded. Which can break things. If you just have the standard repos this is should not be an issue.

The pacakge you listed in your post is just an app.

For me I got three packages to upgrade when I ran "apt-get upgrade" just to see. None of which were obivious to me what they were for. The first two seem be releated to international language support and the last to do with package distribution after some googling.
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51.