![]() |
2012-03-19
, 09:33
|
|
Posts: 857 |
Thanked: 1,206 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Chertsey in the Thames, United Kingdom
|
#42
|
![]() |
2012-03-19
, 17:33
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#43
|
If you were to go by the numbers...
Nokia Lumia 800: 3.7 inch screen @ 800px by 480px = 252.15 ppi
Nokia N9: 3.9 inch screen @ 854px by 480px = 251.19 ppi
1 extra pixel per inch in favor of the Lumia 800. I'm quite sure it makes all the difference, but there's a very slight advantage in regards to pixel per inch; which relates directly to the OP statements of why Nokia should use the 325ppi or so (less for the New iPad) "Retina" type screen.
Not taking up for anybody. Just stating the facts.
The Following User Says Thank You to qwazix For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-24
, 20:21
|
Posts: 347 |
Thanked: 441 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#44
|
If you were to go by the numbers...
Nokia Lumia 800: 3.7 inch screen @ 800px by 480px = 252.15 ppi
Nokia N9: 3.9 inch screen @ 854px by 480px = 251.19 ppi
1 extra pixel per inch in favor of the Lumia 800. I'm quite sure it makes all the difference, but there's a very slight advantage in regards to pixel per inch; which relates directly to the OP statements of why Nokia should use the 325ppi or so (less for the New iPad) "Retina" type screen.
Not taking up for anybody. Just stating the facts.
|
2012-03-24
, 20:29
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#45
|
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-03-24
, 20:36
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#46
|
Lumia has a brightness of 208(!) nits
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph5266/43151.png
![]() |
2012-03-24
, 20:54
|
Posts: 81 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ Romania
|
#47
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ioncelmare For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-24
, 21:08
|
Posts: 347 |
Thanked: 441 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#48
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to The Wizard of Huz For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-03-25
, 07:19
|
Posts: 81 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ Romania
|
#49
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ioncelmare For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-03-25
, 22:36
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#50
|
from my point of view, "apple" is a stupid name for a company, people are buing **** because they start with "i", "retina" display is an incredible stupid name for whatewer technology want's to be.
people will buy stuff only for the fancy names.
50.000.000 peole who buy something means that from 7.000.000.000 people, some are hipnotized and act like monkeis, does not mean they are right. ( remember germany, i'm sure they believed they have blue blood at one moment ).
i'm tired of the "new" technologies who do less than previous one's.
i'm tired of OS were u can't customize a bit, i'm tired of fake news and fake creators. i'm tired of "mondial echonomy", sales strategy, sales consultants, sales, -50%, black friday, black month.
so please, take your "retina", and see if your eye have same resolution, dpi, and whatewer, and alwais remember - u don't see with eyes, your brain do all the work.
![]() |
Tags |
godwin’s law, pentile, screen res |
Thread Tools | |
|
Next time you could maybe try to leave out retina and Apple when trying to make it.
Although many people like the amoled display it sets me back in the same way you describe. " The letters are fuzzy, broken and only when magnified look normal." Especially on the N9, the worst I have seen.
Before I thought the N8 was below my standard.
And my latest eye test has been a month ago, all perfect.
Summarized:
amoled to its fans but Nokia should also offer optional high res, high PPI LCD displays with Harmattan.
And of course with resistive touch screen + stylus.
How difficult can it be.