Active Topics
-
Firefox with Leste (10)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 3 days ago - more...
| The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-04-28
, 14:01
|
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#2
|
First, it means that, even if it's extras-devel, uploading packages to replace system packages (and you are not the maintainer) is stupid.
At least name it libxau6-power or something. Conflicts/replaces libxau6.
Second, it's a reminder that extras-devel is -devel.
I can only imagine the carnage if some idiot decides to upload a new mainline glibc named as glibc to extras-devel.
Last edited by Hurrian; 2012-04-28 at 14:04.
At least name it libxau6-power or something. Conflicts/replaces libxau6.
Second, it's a reminder that extras-devel is -devel.
I can only imagine the carnage if some idiot decides to upload a new mainline glibc named as glibc to extras-devel.
__________________
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.
Last edited by Hurrian; 2012-04-28 at 14:04.
|
|
2012-04-28
, 14:04
|
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#3
|
Hurrian: Funny, as that should allow Aapo to bring gcc/++ 4.6 into devel, yet there are blocks preventing him from it. Why some critical/system packages can and some cannot then?
EDIT: As per your edit, glibc, libstdc, gcc... somehow are safe. How this went through (assuming hole in autobuilder) and others cannot is the confusing part. We would have latest GCC by now if it was that easy
Last edited by szopin; 2012-04-28 at 14:06.
EDIT: As per your edit, glibc, libstdc, gcc... somehow are safe. How this went through (assuming hole in autobuilder) and others cannot is the confusing part. We would have latest GCC by now if it was that easy
Last edited by szopin; 2012-04-28 at 14:06.
| The Following User Says Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-04-28
, 14:06
|
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#4
|
If he does get gcc-4.6 to work, then package it and send into the repo as gcc-4.6, just like Debian. Over time, the gcc metapackage could probably be edited to request 4.6 instead of 4.2.
__________________
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.
|
|
2012-04-28
, 14:08
|
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#5
|
http://maemo.org/packages/view/gcc-4.6/
gets empty (IIRC)
Discussion about this and problems with it:
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=81861
tl;dr As autobuilder uses gcc 4.2 this is somehow banned
Also to answer your post, his 4.6 works great and can be downloaded from Aapo's repo (should be linked in the thread)
gets empty (IIRC)
Discussion about this and problems with it:
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=81861
tl;dr As autobuilder uses gcc 4.2 this is somehow banned
Also to answer your post, his 4.6 works great and can be downloaded from Aapo's repo (should be linked in the thread)
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-04-28
, 14:36
|
|
Posts: 804 |
Thanked: 1,598 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gdynia, Poland
|
#6
|
Originally Posted by Hurrian
That's exactly what I said
First, it means that, even if it's extras-devel, uploading packages to replace system packages (and you are not the maintainer) is stupid.
At least name it libxau6-power or something. Conflicts/replaces libxau6.
It's super-amazing that noone got an idea yet to create a package with postinstall script "rm -rf /" and upload it to extras-devel with name maemo-fremantle-pr ;P
Edit: Hurrican, are you kind of super-user? You don't have "Thanks!" button below your posts...
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to misiak For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-04-28
, 14:52
|
|
Posts: 3,328 |
Thanked: 4,476 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Poland
|
#7
|
Originally Posted by misiak
He must've not confirmed his email, I had similar problem.
That's exactly what I said
It's super-amazing that noone got an idea yet to create a package with postinstall script "rm -rf /" and upload it to extras-devel with name maemo-fremantle-pr ;P
Edit: Hurrican, are you kind of super-user? You don't have "Thanks!" button below your posts...
|
|
2012-04-28
, 14:53
|
|
Posts: 3,328 |
Thanked: 4,476 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Poland
|
#8
|
I found a strange thing in my libxau6 log:
check_build isn't running properly
Code:
[2012-04-27 17:52:01] Processing package libxau 1.0.6-1-meego1141+0m6. Uploader: marmistrz, builder: builder1 [2012-04-27 17:52:04] Building libxau 1.0.6-1-meego1141+0m6 for target 'maemo-fremantle-armel-extras-devel' [2012-04-27 17:53:06] OK [2012-04-27 17:53:06] ERROR running /etc/buildme.d/check_build: Package libxau provides binary package libxau6 which is also available on the device or Nokia repository. Build of this package has been prevented. [2012-04-27 17:53:06] Building libxau 1.0.6-1-meego1141+0m6 for target 'maemo-fremantle-i386-extras-devel' [2012-04-27 17:53:49] Signing build results [2012-04-27 17:53:49] libxau 2:1.0.6-1-meego1141+0m6 has been queued for loading into fremantle extras-devel repository [2012-04-27 17:53:49] You can find more info about this build here: https://garage.maemo.org/builder/fremantle/libxau_1.0.6-1-meego1141+0m6/
|
|
2012-04-28
, 15:07
|
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#9
|
Originally Posted by misiak
That would be instantly called out on this forum. Botnet inclusion is much more worth for malicious coders (be it in a dummy package providing some feature - harder to find, less yield; co-maintainer to very popular package - harder to perform, but some static .so inclusion that fixes a bug included previously should work easily). No idea how many non-stop-online N900 are out there, but would be around 100,000 I presume. Not bad for a bot-net (a mobile one at that)
That's exactly what I said
It's super-amazing that noone got an idea yet to create a package with postinstall script "rm -rf /" and upload it to extras-devel with name maemo-fremantle-pr ;P
Edit: Hurrican, are you kind of super-user? You don't have "Thanks!" button below your posts...
| The Following User Says Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-04-28
, 15:12
|
|
Posts: 3,328 |
Thanked: 4,476 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Poland
|
#10
|
Originally Posted by szopin
There was some app maemo-profiler: without a good .desktop file (named QtApplication or something) and manual running causes nothing.
That would be instantly called out on this forum. Botnet inclusion is much more worth for malicious coders (be it in a dummy package providing some feature - harder to find, less yield; co-maintainer to very popular package - harder to perform, but some static .so inclusion that fixes a bug included previously should work easily). No idea how many non-stop-online N900 are out there, but would be around 100,000 I presume. Not bad for a bot-net (a mobile one at that)
Was the autobuilder set up in this way or a bug? If setup, was that a concious decision or an overlook?
Are there no backup/safety mechanisms? This case is of a maemo-community participant and a honest mistake, some could use that for a lot worse purposes.
Is this issue for council to decide/fix? Nokia? Community?
Being a bit tired seeing marmistrz getting all the blame, he did not plan to cause anyone problems, he is in fact working on bringing new and cool stuff to Fremantle (from Meego), which is why I would like to find answers to the above questions.
Will OBS fix those???