![]() |
2012-07-10
, 11:14
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#372
|
Aegis, and it's wrong reasons-to-be has (justifiably) created a huge hatred against security frameworks.
On the other hand the basis of it's implementation (fine-grained permissions system) not only is correct, it is in my opinion needed in any modern smartphone with so much personal data stored in it.
We are now protected by obscurity, but if I publish tomorrow a dancingbunny_8.32_armel.deb on devel and I promise android app compatibilty I can just upload all of MyDocs of the poor guys that installed it to my server and then wipe their N900 with the init script on next reboot. (or even flash zeros to the kernel area, overclock to death and other nice things).
A current smart device, phone whatever, must have the user in full control.
A control panel applet should be enough to allow realtime granting and revoking privileges to apps. Thus we need a security framework, with the roles reversed, and the human the only one with full caps.
![]() |
2012-07-10
, 11:34
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#373
|
FWIW, the original source does not say that at all. I'm amazed to see what people can cook out of bad google translations.
![]() |
2012-07-10
, 11:36
|
Posts: 1,326 |
Thanked: 1,524 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#374
|
![]() |
2012-07-10
, 11:37
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#375
|
Oh, the hatred was already there. See any number of equally broken and hated attempts like Symbian Signed, Trusted^W^W^W^W^Weacherous Computing, Tivo etc locked devices, and more recently UEFI boot.
That's not what it's for. It's designed to protect the "content" (and by extension the device and content vendors' business models) from you, the owner of the device, and in order to do that it puts your computer under the control of everyone in the foodchain except you.
And if you believe Aegis can protect you from that I've got a nice bridge to sell you too ;-) Trivial proof: inception.
That, and an active community with decent skills, peer review and responsiveness is the only thing that can work IMHO. Cherry was a good example around these parts.
That doesn't work. You either end up with too coarse granularity (Android) or too fine (SELinux).
![]() |
2012-07-10
, 11:45
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 206 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Finland
|
#376
|
@ Jamqpa: i would like to say a big thank you for taking the time out of your day to translate these articles for us none Finnish readers
![]() |
2012-07-10
, 11:57
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#377
|
![]() |
2012-07-10
, 12:30
|
Posts: 8 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
|
#378
|
Have you bothered to read this thread?
No, it will not have Harmattan SwipeUI cause its Nokia properiaty. It may have SOME of the ideas taken from WebOS and Harmattan. (Swipe up to close apps for example)
but dont expect eventview etc...
![]() |
2012-07-10
, 13:16
|
Posts: 951 |
Thanked: 2,344 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ UK
|
#379
|
That could be handle better from Jolla if they estblish real information channals. But t the moment I think they take all the press and aricles they can get, even if its not correct
![]() |
2012-07-10
, 13:28
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#380
|
![]() |
Tags |
jolla, jolla on topic, jollamobile, meego, merproject, nokia, nokian9, professionals, speculations, tizenjolla |
Thread Tools | |
|
and about the Asian manufacture, it could be LG! what do u thing? they are suffering from droid, have no own OS ummm