The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to woody14619 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-09-04
, 17:23
|
Moderator |
Posts: 6,215 |
Thanked: 6,400 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#162
|
|
2012-09-04
, 23:54
|
|
Posts: 1,455 |
Thanked: 3,309 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Rochester, NY
|
#164
|
Sadly, this shows me that not a damn thing has changed these last few weeks.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to woody14619 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-09-05
, 00:12
|
Posts: 1,539 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
@ With my N9
|
#165
|
Arie,
I'd written a rather long reply to this, but after consideration am simply asking this:
When a community member says things that are patently not true about the role Council is playing, should Council not respond to it?
In this instance, we had someone making several false claims (Council is disbanding itself, and/or elevating itself to being the Board, and/or breaking promises, and/or how simple a task they were turning up was). My reply was structured to show, logically, why one of those claims was incorrect. The others were handled in the threads/forums where they were made.
When I was elected, the concept I had was that Council was about handling important requests by the community, and keeping that same community informed about what the facts were and what was happening, to the best of it's ability. Outside of a couple minor delays due to vacations, I feel I've done that.
If you'd prefer that Council remain silent as people spread misinformation (or blatant lies), then I humbly invite you to consider that when you vote for the next Council (in the very near future).
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Arie For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-09-05
, 06:52
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#166
|
|
2012-09-05
, 10:28
|
Posts: 244 |
Thanked: 354 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Scotland
|
#167
|
What have you accomplished in the past 6 months, apart from the well known infighting and awarding devices to yourselves?
The Following User Says Thank You to gregoranderson For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-09-05
, 12:07
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#168
|
That's a 12p LIDL bag-for-life full of LOLZ right there
Spotter's Badge to herpderp.
The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-09-05
, 12:42
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#169
|
|
2012-09-05
, 13:37
|
Posts: 293 |
Thanked: 163 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ beijing-islamabad
|
#170
|
You mean "we have written bylaws and other than this, achieved nothing" post by woody, written in 325234214234325345435 lines, as he use to do, everytime, when asked "troublesome question"?
Tags |
ask council, ask the council, community, councilors, questions |
Thread Tools | |
|
I'd written a rather long reply to this, but after consideration am simply asking this:
When a community member says things that are patently not true about the role Council is playing, should Council not respond to it?
In this instance, we had someone making several false claims (Council is disbanding itself, and/or elevating itself to being the Board, and/or breaking promises, and/or how simple a task they were turning up was). My reply was structured to show, logically, why one of those claims was incorrect. The others were handled in the threads/forums where they were made.
When I was elected, the concept I had was that Council was about handling important requests by the community, and keeping that same community informed about what the facts were and what was happening, to the best of it's ability. Outside of a couple minor delays due to vacations, I feel I've done that.
If you'd prefer that Council remain silent as people spread misinformation (or blatant lies), then I humbly invite you to consider that when you vote for the next Council (in the very near future).
Maemo Council Member: May 2012 - November 2012
Hildon Foundation founding member.
Hildon Foundation Board of Directors: March 2013 - Jan 15, 2014