The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-13
, 17:53
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on May 2012
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rpcameron For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-13
, 17:57
|
Moderator |
Posts: 6,215 |
Thanked: 6,400 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#3
|
![]() |
2013-06-13
, 18:40
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#4
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-13
, 19:09
|
|
Posts: 56 |
Thanked: 25 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Cape Town,South Africa
|
#5
|
Navifirm's no longer usable right... reviewing this atm...
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...16#post1172316
Found alt. way to obtain image but seems way too broken up (Northern EU black 64gb i.e. PR_001):
http://mrcrab.net/nokia/Nokia_N9.htm...n=40.2012.21.3
And not yet clear if one can get content/eMMc images from there too.
*EDIT* All good, I see them both now....
DFL61_HARMATTAN_40.2012.21-3_PR_LEGACY_001-OEM1-958_ARM.bin
29FAD658_DFL61_HARMATTAN_40.2012.13-7.NORTHERNEUROPE_EMMC_NORTHERNEUROPE.bin
Why's the PR code different for the eMMC image, it says 40.2012.13-7, not 40.2012.21-3 like the fw image, is that the latest release for eMMC image?
Can anyone point to the naming schema for all the major releases for both the fw & eMMC/content images? I knew it once, but alas forget.
Still like to know what batch my N9's from, i.e. when/where it was made, if anyone has a clue, please do advise.
The Following User Says Thank You to Loepoes For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-13
, 19:12
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#6
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-06-13
, 19:47
|
Posts: 646 |
Thanked: 1,124 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#7
|
![]() |
2013-06-13
, 20:08
|
Posts: 1,033 |
Thanked: 1,013 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#8
|
Yeah mine's Chinese, I know that much, but it'd be cool to know exact plant & more importantly; how old or recent the batch was that it came from...
I think mine's PR1.0 (I'm not 100% sure until I know the naming schema for all the releases), so that at least tells me that mine's probably from quite a early batch (grumble).
I can't recall if the newest batches shipped with PR1.2/1.3, or whether we had to update to them from PR1.1/1.2, if the latter, then mine being PR1.0 doesn't necessarily prove it's from a "1.0 batch".
Night.
![]() |
2013-06-14
, 04:44
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#9
|
Mine was a Vietnamese country variant and shipped with PR1.2 when I bought it last year.
Exact manufacturing date is printed on my box which said June 2012, don't remember the day. I bought it in end of July.
Can anyone point to the naming schema for all the major releases for both the fw & eMMC/content images? I knew it once, but alas forget.
![]() |
2013-06-14
, 06:46
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#10
|
![]() |
Tags |
nokia n9 |
Thread Tools | |
|
Few Qns, since I've not been a ultra heavy Maemo/MeeGo user for 12mth+ now:
(1)
Is there a way to tell exactly what batch my N9 came from? (i.e. when/where it was manufactured)
(2)
How to tell which PR I have? (I knew once, but my memory's like a sieve)
I suspect PR1.0 looking at the version no: 10.2011.34-1.299.1_PR_299
(3)
To flash to PR1.3, do I seriously have to do so in Windows, OS X definitely not a option?
(I'm pretty certain of the answer to this, but I resent having to install Windows just to complete one task >.>)
I'll be disappointed if this N9 turns out to be from a much older batch than my other N9, but I guess in-the-end it shouldn't matter too much.
(4)
Finally, one thing I'm noticing about this new N9 that (somewhat) irks me...
The entire left & right sides of the glass overlay rise up quite sharply, so the thumb does not travel smoothly from the body over to the screen.
The bottom & top ends of the glass overlay do not exhibit this same problem*, the transition from body to display is nice & smooth.
Also the buttons seem to be way more recessed & of lesser quality, especially the power button.
I'm quite sure my N9 16GB was never like this, alas I don't have it on hand right now to compare.
That's it for now, but I'm sure many other questions will pop into my head over the coming days, thanks comrades!
P.S.
For those on the hunt for one again, I've a list of retailers, telcos, & telco resellers in Oz that may still have at least 1x N9 16GB or 64GB
*actually the top does a tiny bit, & the entire RHS of the overlay isn't as bad as the LHS
Last edited by jalyst; 2013-06-13 at 15:21.