![]() |
2013-06-26
, 21:24
|
Posts: 1,298 |
Thanked: 2,277 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#1
|
![]() |
2013-07-13
, 13:11
|
|
Posts: 956 |
Thanked: 2,628 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#3
|
@JollaHQ
@faenil @PeppeLaKappa @VDVsx our first Jolla will ship with wayland, yes
![]() |
2013-07-13
, 13:18
|
|
Posts: 956 |
Thanked: 2,628 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#4
|
![]() |
2013-07-13
, 15:21
|
Posts: 479 |
Thanked: 1,284 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ Enschede, The Netherlands
|
#5
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Fuzzillogic For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-07-13
, 18:33
|
|
Posts: 1,839 |
Thanked: 2,432 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#6
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tissot For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-07-13
, 18:55
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#7
|
Which is excellent news. XWayland isn't supported however. I guess that rules out Qt4.x, and thus we get to see Qt5 from the get-go. Which is also good news!
However.. No XWayland support (and no Qt4.x) might limit the portability of apps from desktop-space? While it likely wouldn't be a design goal of Jolla, I'd still like the idea of hooking up a mobile to an HDMI screen, pairing a bt keyboard and mouse, and use it as a (admittedly somewhat limited) desktop, running full KDE. Is this correct? Or would it be trivial to add XWayland by the community using community-based repositories?
The Following User Says Thank You to mikecomputing For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-07-14
, 06:30
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#8
|
![]() |
2013-07-15
, 13:20
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#9
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-07-16
, 10:25
|
Posts: 120 |
Thanked: 279 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Perth, Australia
|
#10
|
Does Qt5 instead of Qt4 mean anything for the Python applications already ported to sailfish? I'm not sure, but I believe I've read somewhere that Python bindings aren't compatible (yet?) with Qt5. Is that correct?
![]() |
Tags |
votingforcnotp! |
Thread Tools | |
|