|
2013-10-07
, 04:30
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#262
|
|
2013-10-07
, 08:28
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#263
|
Most people will continue use Windows even if they only use it for simple task like web surfing.
|
2013-10-07
, 09:05
|
Posts: 1,341 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#264
|
This cannot be fixed unfortunately. Linux on ARM makes sense as you still have all the apps in repos, readily recompiled for you. It is impossible to recompile the world of windows, and an emulator is out of the question, not enough grunt.
|
2013-10-07
, 11:52
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#265
|
I've recently splashed out on a new laptop. After 6+ years of using Linux exclusively on my home machine, the idea of paying Microsoft Tax™ really stroked my hair the wrong way. So I spent a lot of time researching into buying a new, reasonably specced laptop without Windows preinstalled.
I hate to say that I failed miserably. Yes, there are options, but at least here in the UK the reality is such that a new laptop without Windows is at least 20% more expensive than the equivalent with Windows on. In my case it translates to saving about £150 by giving part of it to Microsoft. Much as I hate myself for that, I took those 150 pieces of silver and now I pay for it with my frustration with Windows 8's huge step back in terms of usability.
I understand the economics of it: OS-free or Linux-preinstlled laptops sell in much smaller quantities through small companies who cannot afford to push the prices down the way the behemoths like Dell do. But the point is that yes, people will continue using Windows. Not necessarily through conscious choice but through a perceived lack of other options.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-10-07
, 17:34
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 552 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
|
#266
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to switch-hitter For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-10-07
, 19:14
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#267
|
"Normal" desktop Linuxes have poor touchscreen support and applications are not designed for a touch screen UX.
Therefore Android
|
2013-10-07
, 20:07
|
Posts: 496 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ London
|
#268
|
The Following User Says Thank You to strongm For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-10-07
, 20:40
|
Posts: 1,341 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#269
|
Here we go again with Android propaganda. Ever heard of plasmaactive?
Current number of Android apps in the market: 861190
|
2013-10-07
, 23:57
|
|
Posts: 1,789 |
Thanked: 1,699 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#270
|
Tags |
espionage, trojan man |
Thread Tools | |
|
Windows 8.1 RT = Metro start tiles - Desktop + unified mobile non x86 store (labeled as such)
Windows 8.1 Pro = Metro + Desktop + x86 store (labeled as such)
Windows 8.x Phone = Metro start tiles + unified mobile non x86 store (labeled as such)
Windows 2012 Server = Metro (optional, I personally HATE it on Server) + Desktop + Powershell + x86 store + MSDN
Drop non-Pro Windows OS, only Windows 8.1 Pro.