Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Feb 2006
#31
Hi Andy,

I followed as best I could all the instructions on your blog for getting Einstein running on my 770, but when I try to run the einstein binary (I've tried loads of -- options) I get "Segmentation Fault"

I have enable root, ssh, successfully run your script to kill all the GUI and stuff, and I have a US MP2x00 (upgraded) ROM 717006 (which works fine on Einstein on MacOSX).

Can you suggest anything I might be doing wrong? Is it possible I have the wrong Nokia770 binary?

Thanks in advance for any help, this is driving me crazy!! :-)

Thanks for your fantastic work in getting this up and running and posting the howto!
 
Odin's Avatar
Posts: 207 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ Texas
#32
Originally Posted by Remote User
I was there. I met Dave Small (Littleton, CO) several times at Atari shows, and once when I paid his airfare to my office in '95. Late in the 80's I watched him insert a floppy drive into the Atari and turn it into a Macintosh. Think about that. Everything that made the Macintosh what it was was reduced to some code on a floppy. The Atari ST & Macintosh were both 68000 'puters, and so was the Amiga. The Atari ST was color, though from Day 1 while the Macintosh was still a black & white computer.

The illusion that the Apple Chips were necessary was a go-around to prevent him from being prosecuted by Apple for copying their intellectual property. That's all that it was. The Atari ST hardware, unmodified, was as good, or better, at being a Macintosh than Apple's own hardware was and the difference was nothing more than a couple of hundred K of code on a floppy. This was not entirely either a coincidence or 100% genius on Dave's part because Motorola published a reference design on how to build a computer with the 68000 that all these companies followed. That's how Motorola achieved these design wins for its 68000 CPU. At the time the Intel CPU was the infamous 'brain dead' 286. You had to be there.
Actually, I was there. I owned an Atari ST (could not afford a Mac at the time) and later, a Newton. The simple reality of all of it is that we live in 1) a capitalist society and 2) a democracy governed by law. It does indeed take a college (EE, ECE, possibly CS) degree to understand that all you need to emulate a Mac on an ST is a disk and guess what, the same is true of a Windoze box. So the transformation seems magical (hence the name "Magic Sac"). The dilemma comes from the junction of (1) and (2). When money is involved and laws are present to protect it, well, you know the rest...

As an aside: few know that Apple had planned on using Intel for the Mac. The support chips were not ready, so they went with Motorola. Now history has come full circle. At least we can sleep soundly knowing that there is a God--that was revealed when Apple went to Unix for Mac OS X.
 
speculatrix's Avatar
Posts: 880 | Thanked: 264 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Cambridge, UK
#33
it's a shame that progress on this is so slow!

BTW, I remember running a Mac emulator program on my Amiga, you just booted off a floppy. There was enough space on the floppy to include one mac program (paint, I think) and a trivial game. The only reason it wasn't more widely adopted, I think, was because it was far from trivial to read mac floppies!
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:58.