![]() |
2013-07-14
, 22:07
|
|
Posts: 74 |
Thanked: 42 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
@ Oslo - around
|
#12
|
Mac OS X and the iPhone OS are Darwin underneath, which is based on BSD and NeXTSTEP. They're both Unix-like systems, so they do have some things in common, but Linux doesn't share any code with Darwin/BSD.
![]() |
2013-07-23
, 21:24
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#13
|
|
2014-11-03
, 06:26
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#14
|
No, you are wrong. Indeed, your quote of wikipedia says nothing about UNIX being a commercial version o Linux. It says "unix-like".
In fact, Linux means "Linux is not Unix".
UNIX is not really an operating system: It could better be understood as a set of tools which names, options and behaviours must be respected in order for an Operating System being called of Unix flavour.
Solaris is a Unix flavour, BSD is a Unix flavour, MacOS X is a Unix flavour, SCO is/was a Unix flavour.
Linux+GNU tools is not a Unix flavour, as it has never been certified as so. It's more of an "emulator" that tries to be compliant to Unix but without being Unix.
Mac OS X is POSIX compliant, and Linux flavors typically do not get certified (because of the costs).