|
2015-05-06
, 11:17
|
|
Posts: 505 |
Thanked: 665 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#2422
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to TomJ For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-05-06
, 13:33
|
Posts: 79 |
Thanked: 719 times |
Joined on May 2014
@ Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
#2423
|
There were 423 donations. How many of them were at least 100€ worth ?
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to wpwrak For This Useful Post: | ||
Amboss, Bearserker, cproc, endsormeans, joerg_rw, juiceme, klinglerware, OVK, peterleinchen, reinob, Ulle, wicket, Wikiwide, wolke, xman |
|
2015-05-06
, 15:20
|
|
Posts: 3,141 |
Thanked: 8,161 times |
Joined on Feb 2013
@ From my Gabriola Island hermitage, near the Edge of the World
|
#2424
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to endsormeans For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-05-06
, 19:58
|
|
Posts: 2,222 |
Thanked: 12,651 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ SOL 3
|
#2425
|
[...]
A-
-IF (and I completely believe it) the device will be so security conscious that essentially there simply isn't anything like it ...safety-wise...past or present
why.. in this over sensitive post-snowden wiki-leak era...in these absolutely perfect conditions..
1-why don't we have more of the security conscious in society to the downright neurotically paranoid average consumer stepping up to purchase? I mean there are literally BILLIONS of paranoid potential purchasers out there...and millions of neurotics with enough cash to buy...so why are we stalled at 423 donators/purchasers?
2-why don't we have the corporations who MUST HAVE secure communications banging down the door to order? A decade ago Blackberry ruled the corporate and business world and their angle was in great part ..the secure communications..they're done and their methods of security with them..and really no one has stepped up to the plate and filled the gap or done even better still..until now with the neo's un-comparable security....so why aren't there the 100 000's...10 000's ...even 1000's of companies and businessmen banging down the door?
3-Why ...(like Mr. Stallman has mentioned many times) ...that Governments MUST have secure systems... and secure linux is what they run... Why are they not banging down the door to purchase everything that is available?
4- IF (and I completely believe it) there is the ability to create such a limited number of devices... 1000 possibly 2000 units...
why isn't that being reflected in a stupidly-rapid escalation of demand?
Demand should be choking the living-crap out of supply ...
There simply should not be one single unit available for purchase... out of the maximum 2000 units (that is the ceiling) to produce ...
Considering all the above "1" to "4" ...there is no reason why... in all of creation's green and pleasant lands ...there shouldn't be one unit left 2 years on now...available for purchase.
Only 400+ people in 2 years ...something is off PR wise....really.
A Seriously professional PR (possibly team) is needed here...really really really badly.
To Pitch it , wrap it up pretty for advertising, directed right at the audience intended.
When I make a "line" of pieces..in a collection...the fact that "there are only these units or a single unit is available" and then...no more..is pitch...part of my pitch also is selling the story behind the pieces..their meanings..selling that they can have the same things ...do the same things..be the same things as me..live the "kind" of life I live...also part of the graphic story I've carved painted..worked.. is little sometimes common...but usually little known and obscure mythology...so imparting to the client the visibly seen yet "hidden" meaning(s) rendered makes the client feel inclusive..part of the story...privileged..to own it...which they should...there is soul to the product...business-wise that is also pitch.....selling "must have" elements...(longevity, quality..etc)..more pitch..diversity..wife wants jewelry, husband wants belt buckles, embellishment work in a favourite gun stock ..etc..more product pitch...and security..."quality hand weapons, knives, swords, blunt and otherwise rendered unique and exquisitely for the protection of self and loved ones..for you, your wife, your kids..some are great for practice..great for training ..all are heirlooms to pass down...quiet..and no reloading bullets required" ...I pitch products across the board...
All told after estimating the intended audience and their needs ..doing some good pitching.. and that usually creates a frenzy right there and the work is sold...
(perhaps in this sitch ..selling the pitch to a more general audience is a good idea...since I see the pitch aiming at a very small section of the hacker community...Broadening that pitch's scope to include the stock-broker, corporate executives in companies who need secure comm. , government security agents, government low-high level officials...etc ...would help I'm sure..)
B-
- to all the donators/ investors...
I know it is hard...despair and feeling hopeless ain't an easy thing to deal with and it isn't a solution...
and I'm sure the team has had enough rough patches of their own and dealt enough with that..
Take a breath...Grit your teeth boys ..
I know that isn't easy...and lets wait a bit ...
It isn't just up to the team to come up with solutions...
We all can help with that...
Being re-active never helped anyone..
It doesn't take control of the sitch.
It's just "responding" to it.
Being pro-active will help.
Wicket, wpwrak and some others voiced that...and I agree..
what is needed are solutions ..alternatives...ideas....
scrutined..
accepted or rejected...
Our best ability as a community of gadgeteers is finding a way... problem solving...
It isn't the ability to "give up"..
Walking out the door because we "hear" or "see" a number isn't an answer...
well it IS an answer...
but it is the wrong one at this point.
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to joerg_rw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-05-06
, 20:34
|
Posts: 915 |
Thanked: 3,209 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Germany
|
#2426
|
-IF (and I completely believe it) the device will be so security conscious that essentially there simply isn't anything like it ...safety-wise...past or present
why.. in this over sensitive post-snowden wiki-leak era...in these absolutely perfect conditions..
why don't we have more of the security conscious in society to the downright neurotically paranoid average consumer stepping up to purchase? I mean there are literally BILLIONS of paranoid potential purchasers out there...and millions of neurotics with enough cash to buy...so why are we stalled at 423 donators/purchasers?
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to sulu For This Useful Post: | ||
Amboss, Bearserker, cproc, DA5, Fellfrosch, handaxe, joerg_rw, juiceme, pichlo, reinob, sixwheeledbeast, wicket, xman |
|
2015-05-06
, 20:51
|
|
Posts: 3,141 |
Thanked: 8,161 times |
Joined on Feb 2013
@ From my Gabriola Island hermitage, near the Edge of the World
|
#2427
|
|
2015-05-06
, 21:14
|
|
Posts: 3,141 |
Thanked: 8,161 times |
Joined on Feb 2013
@ From my Gabriola Island hermitage, near the Edge of the World
|
#2428
|
The Following User Says Thank You to endsormeans For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-05-07
, 01:10
|
Posts: 79 |
Thanked: 719 times |
Joined on May 2014
@ Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
#2429
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to wpwrak For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-05-07
, 02:05
|
|
Posts: 3,141 |
Thanked: 8,161 times |
Joined on Feb 2013
@ From my Gabriola Island hermitage, near the Edge of the World
|
#2430
|
Tags |
neo900, thank you! |
Thread Tools | |
|
The "per device" cost is 525€ + shipping
The fixed cost for the whole project (R&D+Loan) is 190k €
The main way to significantly decrease the total cost of a device is to decrease the fixed cost, by selling more devices. I mean, if 1000 Neo900 are sold instead of 500, each customer pays 190€ instead of 380€. In many countries (with 20% VAT), it means more than 230€ saved for each customer. So what about finding a partnership, or launching a crowdfunding (as wicket proposed a few posts above) ? With a crowdfunding, the "per device" cost can be adjusted with the main goal of the project.
One more thing is the pool of donators who will not buy a device.
I'm sure not every donation will end with an order. And I'm sure there will be a few "new" customers who didn't previously donate because they were not aware of this project.
There were 423 donations. How many of them were at least 100€ worth ? Let call this number X.
As soon as there are more than 500-X orders without rebate, each new order (ie without rebate) means for the smallest rebate remaining (ie not used yet) :
- either it will be used, so (380 - its worth) € is gained for the project / could have been removed from the fixed costs
- or it will not be used, so its worth is gained for the project / could have been removed from the fixed costs
What I mean is if we can accurately evaluate the number of buyers (especially new buyers) and it's high enough, the price can fall for everyone, which means more potential buyers.
Last edited by Bearserker; 2015-05-06 at 14:31.