Active Topics
-
[HOWTO] Comprehensive Firmware Flashing Guide for N9 (1,580)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by aspergerguy - 13 hrs, 2 mins ago -
Nokia N9-00 Prototype Build S1.12 (RM-680 codename "Dali") (250)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by en0s - 3 days, 9 hrs ago -
[Announce] Maebble - Pebble support for Maemo (118)
to Applications by glo-worm - 3 days, 21 hrs ago -
Possible to flash Leste to eMMC? (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Eri - 4 days, 11 hrs ago - more...
 |
tangent |
2015-05-18
, 19:40
|
|
Posts: 87 |
Thanked: 124 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Finland
|
#61
|
I sincerely hope gstreamer-1.0 fixes will land to SF2.0 (praise the devs if they do it)
.
.| The Following User Says Thank You to tangent For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2015-05-18
, 20:00
|
|
Posts: 338 |
Thanked: 496 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#62
|
Originally Posted by Kake41
Have you tried using the different user agents? It takes less than 5 seconds to change. It's extremely rare that one of them won't render either optimally or acceptably on WebPirate ... and quite the opposite on SF Browser (where there's no choice of user agent).
I wanted to say that when the tablet comes out it should have a good browser. Yes, I know that the OS itself is not tied with the browser but one can expect a good browser on SFOS 2.0 Tablet.
Webpirate is showing some web sites incorrectly. Thats why I have to use the native browser.
Open this http://www.eksote.fi/fi/terveyspalve...t/default.aspx
with WebPirate. It does not scale the page correctly.
| The Following User Says Thank You to bluefoot For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2015-05-18
, 20:17
|
|
Posts: 6,450 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#64
|
Originally Posted by coderus
You mean they SHOULD be separate things. Judging by Jolla's track record of doing updates in the past, they see the OS and all stock applications as one big, monolithic block.
SailfishOS and Sailfish Browser are different things and not tied to each other.
| The Following User Says Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2015-05-18
, 20:21
|
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#65
|
Originally Posted by pichlo
nothing stops you from uninstalling browser, this is not internet explorer, how they manage updates is irrelevant (there used to be nightly build of browser on open repos, seems abandoned atm)
You mean they SHOULD be separate things. Judging by Jolla's track record of doing updates in the past, they see the OS and all stock applications as one big, monolithic block.
| The Following User Says Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2015-05-18
, 20:26
|
|
Posts: 338 |
Thanked: 496 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#66
|
Originally Posted by szopin
That wasn't maintained by Jolla AFAIK. That was when the Browser's source repositories had been updated, but we were in the 5 month gap between updates, so community members (forget who) started updating the code.
nothing stops you from uninstalling browser, this is not internet explorer, how they manage updates is irrelevant (there used to be nightly build of browser on open repos, seems abandoned atm)
|
|
2015-05-18
, 20:33
|
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#67
|
Originally Posted by bluefoot
I believe it was coderus, but don't quote me on that, still, SFOS is NOT tied to it (it probably is tied to the latest qt version, but not the other way around)
That wasn't maintained by Jolla AFAIK. That was when the Browser's source repositories had been updated, but we were in the 5 month gap between updates, so community members (forget who) started updating the code.
|
|
2015-05-19
, 05:27
|
|
Posts: 66 |
Thanked: 80 times |
Joined on Dec 2013
@ Finland
|
#68
|
Originally Posted by bluefoot
I have tried with all the possible user agents. It won't help.
Have you tried using the different user agents? It takes less than 5 seconds to change. It's extremely rare that one of them won't render either optimally or acceptably on WebPirate ... and quite the opposite on SF Browser (where there's no choice of user agent).
|
|
2015-05-20
, 13:07
|
|
Posts: 338 |
Thanked: 496 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#69
|
Originally Posted by Kake41
I suspect that means there's a problem with the website, then. Webkit (particularly mobile version AFAIK) is more standards compliant than Gecko these days.
I have tried with all the possible user agents. It won't help.
| The Following User Says Thank You to bluefoot For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2015-05-20
, 13:59
|
|
Posts: 956 |
Thanked: 2,628 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#70
|
No it's really not. Webkit is becoming the nowadays Internet Explorer actually.
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Morpog For This Useful Post: | ||
