![]() |
2015-08-24
, 18:09
|
Posts: 1,326 |
Thanked: 1,524 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#2
|
![]() |
2015-08-24
, 18:23
|
Posts: 188 |
Thanked: 223 times |
Joined on Apr 2013
@ Poland
|
#3
|
![]() |
2015-08-24
, 20:30
|
Posts: 1,326 |
Thanked: 1,524 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#4
|
So, what can we tell, n900 aren't made equal, but there imho shouldn't be so noticeable gap between some.
How to check were my tablet was made? Should I go through papers? I know it's designed in Finland, hehe
But now, how it should be?
The n900, should go over 900mhz with smart reflex or they should not? What can we describe as "golden unit"? Is it even possible to describe?
And finally? What are those variance you mentioned?
Is it better circuit capacity? What I mean is, are those "better" units better handle higher voltages and frequency? Sorry for my unsettled describe, Im not an hardware engineer :P
The Following User Says Thank You to MINKIN2 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-08-24
, 21:37
|
Posts: 188 |
Thanked: 223 times |
Joined on Apr 2013
@ Poland
|
#5
|
With that said, other users with n900s that were “made in china” (in including myself) can overclock up to and over 1150mhz. I preferred a manual approach then adding a queenbee OC widget to the desktop. I would like to ask if smartreflex is the only method you have used?
And finally... The variants in the CPUs are most likely a manufacturing fault in the batch process, were they have found that a certain set of gates in the microprocessor do not open as they should when called for.
This is a very common problem in chipset manufacturing. Intel have this too, and are known for 'down grading' their production batches. For instance, when running a batch of Pentium4 processors and they find they do not run to full capacity for that very same issue, they will not throw them away. They will just put a Celeron sticker on them. For Nokia, they negated this issue by designing the n900 to be stable at 600mhz*.
I hope that answered many of your questions. If I am wrong anywhere, there are more knowledgeable folk around who will correct me. And I do admit, much of what I have said is from following 5yr old threads. Things may have moved on a lot since I last booted up my n900.
The Following User Says Thank You to Ridd92 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-08-24
, 21:57
|
Posts: 959 |
Thanked: 3,427 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
|
#6
|
![]() |
2015-08-25
, 17:34
|
Posts: 188 |
Thanked: 223 times |
Joined on Apr 2013
@ Poland
|
#7
|
I know from experience that the chips vary; my first n900 was only stable up to 800 mHz, but the replacement I got is stable all the way to 1150 mhz.
![]() |
2015-08-25
, 18:15
|
Posts: 2,292 |
Thanked: 4,135 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ UK
|
#8
|
![]() |
2015-08-25
, 18:16
|
Posts: 2,292 |
Thanked: 4,135 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ UK
|
#9
|
![]() |
2015-08-25
, 19:11
|
Posts: 188 |
Thanked: 223 times |
Joined on Apr 2013
@ Poland
|
#10
|
SR only "supports" overclocking to 900Mhz
http://wiki.maemo.org/Smartreflex
First, I know that there is many topics about over-clock, many single post's what include people's manual and, of course, wiki page about it, but
None of these include something I want to be explained.
So, smart reflex:
I had at least a few n900 devices, and all of course I over-clocked.
But my last two (2) devices (I still have them, and those are not the youngest from my collection) I could over-clock over 900mhz (To the 1100mhz) with smart reflex on, and with many voltage profiles (Including my own), been using them for days without experiencing any problems, random reboots, slows down and so.
Before those two n900s over-clock over 900mhz with SR on will give me crash imidietley.
The n900 I use everyday I have fixed @950mhz with ideal voltage profile, smart-reflex on and never had any problems (Now for half a year)
My n900 is running maemo 5 with cssu update - maybe that's the thing? Did cssu bring something new about over-clock?