elastic
|
2016-02-22
, 14:07
|
Posts: 229 |
Thanked: 725 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Permanent cruiser - either water- or motorways
|
#111
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to elastic For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-02-22
, 14:12
|
Posts: 735 |
Thanked: 1,054 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#113
|
Really? Everywhere I look, I see screens of up to 4.5" max. Only about 30% of phone users around me have bigger screens and of those who do, 50% say they would have preferred smaller but did not get the choice.
In other words, only about 15% of the population wants huge screens. There is a LOT of market for smaller sizes. The way I see it, the manufacturers force the bigger sizes on us for the same reason applications and OSes eat more and more resources: laziness to optimize.
The Following User Says Thank You to Jedibeeftrix For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-02-22
, 14:32
|
Posts: 435 |
Thanked: 1,599 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#114
|
|
2016-02-22
, 14:59
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#116
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-02-22
, 15:58
|
|
Posts: 2,448 |
Thanked: 9,523 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Wigan, UK
|
#118
|
higher margins chase public trends, and public trend appears to value ever larger high-res screens.
|
2016-02-22
, 16:41
|
|
Posts: 7,074 |
Thanked: 9,069 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#119
|
|
2016-02-22
, 18:38
|
Posts: 334 |
Thanked: 2,004 times |
Joined on Oct 2013
@ Fin
|
#120
|