![]() |
2008-03-03
, 00:31
|
|
Posts: 643 |
Thanked: 628 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Seattle (or thereabouts)
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Johnx For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-03-03
, 01:05
|
Posts: 65 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#3
|
Nokia-N810-42-19:~# apt-cache rdepends libart-2.0-2 libart-2.0-2 Reverse Depends: libart-2.0-dev libgoffice-0-6 libgoffice-0-6 Nokia-N810-42-19:~# apt-cache policy libgoffice-0-6 libgoffice-0-6: Installed: 0.6.1-2chinook2 Candidate: 0.6.1-2chinook2 Version table: *** 0.6.1-2chinook2 0 500 http://repository.maemo.org chinook/free Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.6.1-2chinook1 0 500 http://repository.maemo.org chinook/free Packages Nokia-N810-42-19:~# apt-cache rdepends libgoffice-0-6 libgoffice-0-6 Reverse Depends: gnumeric gnumeric libgoffice-dbg libgoffice-0-6-dev libgoffice-dbg libgoffice-0-6-dev Nokia-N810-42-19:~#
![]() |
2008-03-03
, 02:12
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#4
|
The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-03-03
, 07:23
|
Posts: 139 |
Thanked: 24 times |
Joined on Sep 2005
|
#5
|
So. Gnumeric is the culprit. Is this resolvable?
If, for example, I uninstall gnumeric and then reinstall libart followed by gnumeric, is gnumeric likely to accept this?
Is it possible to specify the repository I want apt-get to use for a specific install? (I suppose I could wget the version I want and then install from the local file.)
I get the point of "two versions of libart available". In the real world this is going to happen. But how do debian adepts deal with this sort of issue?
The Following User Says Thank You to jussik For This Useful Post: | ||
Beyond that, are there general strategies for resolving this sort of thing in the future? References existing docs and write-ups gladly accepted. TIA