|
2008-05-08
, 22:31
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#22
|
|
2008-05-08
, 23:15
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#23
|
I guess I'm not following most of what you're saying.
As I said at the start, the "phone" part of the phone isn't important to me. I want the "data" part.
The N6555 supports HSDPA and is Bluetooth 2.0.
If there is a phone I should be looking at that would provide better / faster data access, please clue me in.
As an aside, if AT&T offers a Smart Phone similar in size to the N6555 that is sold with the DataConnect unlimited plan, I'd like to know which one it is.
Mike
The Following User Says Thank You to eViL D: For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-05-08
, 23:26
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#24
|
|
2008-05-08
, 23:42
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#25
|
Google has about an equal number of hits that say it is HSDPA and isn't HSDPA.
Lets assume it's not.
The Samsung A737 says Bluetooth 2.0 & HSDPA on AT&T's website.
The LG CU515 is Bluetooth 1.2.
Mike
|
2008-05-09
, 13:42
|
Posts: 162 |
Thanked: 65 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Indiana
|
#26
|
Personally I have a Samsung A737 with cingulars MediaNet Unlimited. Doesn't technically allow for tethering but I was told that it was the only data plan for my phone so I took it. Works fine and no over charges. $15 a month
|
2008-05-09
, 14:36
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#27
|
|
2008-05-09
, 14:53
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#28
|
|
2008-05-09
, 16:23
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#29
|
The SE Z750a is the only one I see that lists HSDPA 2100 / Tri-band 3G.
Seems like HSDPA 2100 would be a nice thing to have. Right?
Mike
|
2008-05-09
, 16:40
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#30
|
I don't know why you want to spend more money for the same thing. DataConnect gets you onto the ATT network, just like MediaNet. The only difference is the proxy, which has not bearing on what you access or how fast you can access it. You internet access via CELLULAR is limited to how fast your phone can download it and how fast it can send it to your phone. You would probably have been better off getting a phone that is HSDPA (3.5G) than a UMTS (3G) phone. I just don't get why you picked the cheapest phone but would be willing to pay a higher data plan. If you really want to spend the money, just go change your phone model (to a smartphone) in your ATT profile and try to add the DataConnect. You will notice that your bottleneck is your 3G phone (384K u/d) as opposed to an HSDPA phone (1.8-3.6 MB/s). Also, depending on the Bluetooth version, 1.1, 1.2 or 2.0 will determine how fast the data can get sent to your NIT.