Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 32 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on May 2008 @ Chattanowhere TN
#1
Is there anyway to make desktop applets unmoveable after you finally get them exatly where you want them?
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#2
Originally Posted by Iceman0124 View Post
Is there anyway to make desktop applets unmoveable after you finally get them exatly where you want them?
Sadly, no. Please vote for bug # 2639.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Karel Jansens's Avatar
Posts: 3,220 | Thanked: 326 times | Joined on Oct 2005 @ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
#3
Originally Posted by Iceman0124 View Post
Is there anyway to make desktop applets unmoveable after you finally get them exatly where you want them?
No. Nokia doesn't want you to have peace of mind.
__________________
Watch out Nokia, Pandora's box has opened (sorta)...
I do love explaining cryptic sigs, but for the impatient: http://www.openpandora.org/
 
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#4
This was one of the few anti-improvements over OS2007, which locked apps automatically.
 
Posts: 118 | Thanked: 16 times | Joined on Sep 2007
#5
It's a "feature" Nokia blessed us with. I love seeing people try to defend the constantly moving apps.
 
Posts: 674 | Thanked: 191 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Buenos Aires, Argentina
#6
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
Sadly, no. Please vote for bug # 2639.
Voted.....
 

The Following User Says Thank You to alephito For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#7
Originally Posted by geneven View Post
This was one of the few anti-improvements over OS2007, which locked apps automatically.
Originally Posted by MstPrgmr View Post
I love seeing people try to defend the constantly moving apps.
I believe the only argument one can make in the current system's favor is that it ended the widespread cries of "Why is it so hard to rearrange applets?" and "Why can't applets overlap?" from the days of OS2007. That doesn't justify swinging as far in the other direction as OS2008 does though.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#8
I haven't seen anyone "defend the constantly moving apps." I do consider it a move in the right direction; the transparency and overlappability is great, and that's the main functionality difference; they unfortunately implemented a wrong revised UI for handling it.

Constantly moving = bad.
Non-overlappable = very bad.

So we're a little ahead, but I don't defend that aspect of it at all, and it's not an inherent tradeoff, so defending the overlappability does not imply any defense of the unlockability.

As far as I can tell, that's (a more verbose version of) the strongest pro-2008 sentiment around; if you can point to some actual defense, I'd be interested. Should be highly funny...
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#9
Originally Posted by Benson View Post
...if you can point to some actual defense, I'd be interested. Should be highly funny...
The closest I can think of is a thread where the issue was brought up by akd, and Texrat, Rebski, and I responded with what was taken by some to be, but was never intended as, a defense.
 
Posts: 631 | Thanked: 1,123 times | Joined on Sep 2005 @ Helsinki
#10
Originally Posted by MstPrgmr View Post
It's a "feature" Nokia blessed us with. I love seeing people try to defend the constantly moving apps.
It will get fixed, eventually... Trust me.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ragnar For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02.