![]() |
2008-09-22
, 16:39
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#22
|
![]() |
2008-09-22
, 16:43
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#23
|
Honestly, I don't see much point in a server that you have to plug in. That means HDs and x86 are out the window.
The interesting thing to me is something ARM-based that can run off a battery for some appreciable period of time.
![]() |
2008-09-22
, 16:51
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#24
|
I agree about not having to plug it in. I don't agree that it rules out HDs, but it does eliminate full size HD's, and probably 2.5" HDs. But, as I pointed out, my reason for suggesting an disk slot was for an optional SSD, not for an HDD.
The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-09-22
, 16:53
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#25
|
Are you suggesting a light weight home server? I've thought about that kind of thing too. Something like this could be used as a linux-based alternative to an airport base station, with lots of flexibility about access interfaces, storage, on-device services, etc. With the added bonus of an internal battery that can act as a UPS.
But, my primary interest is in an "in backpack" server/gateway device.
![]() |
2008-09-22
, 16:56
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#26
|
Honestly, we've already got the guts of the hardware. Take an overo or a Beagle Board and slap it into a case with some accessories built in.
Done.
![]() |
2008-09-22
, 17:06
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#27
|
Bleh SSD. It's just a bunch of flash chips with an SATA interface attached. Cheaper and easier just to drop a bunch of SD cards in the thing (5-card RAID array anybody?).
Erm, home server that runs off a battery? . . .
![]() |
2008-09-22
, 17:10
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#28
|
![]() |
2008-09-22
, 17:16
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#29
|
Plus, I'd rather have one large (real) file system than 4 or 5 small ones that I have to juggle with things like a union file system, a (fragile) concatenated file system, etc. SSD == simple way to get an easy to manage 64GB+ file system.
![]() |
2008-09-22
, 17:21
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#30
|
If you do it right, you could slap a HDD on instead of the battery pack, and power the whole mess via wall-wart. (And if you do it really right, you could slap on both, and get limited shock-resistance and battery-life, but still have mobility and cheap storage.)
World's first inductively-charged N900!