The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-05-10
, 03:32
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#42
|
No, because beyond the intention to do it the technical details have not yet been hashed out.
There will be a lot of collision between Talk usernames and Freenode usernames and a reasonable way of working this out is needed.
![]() |
2009-05-10
, 03:45
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#43
|
Let's make something clear: The people who were running maemo.org 2 years ago are not the same people running it today.
2 years ago, maemo.org was Nokia owned and operated, now it is community owned and operated
The Following User Says Thank You to penguinbait For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-05-10
, 03:51
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#44
|
Interesting, do we have some numbers to put to this? How many active members of ITT vs active members of the mailing lists?
![]() |
2009-05-10
, 10:11
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#45
|
Open communication is one of the core values of the Community Council, both to serve as an example to Nokia and because it's the right thing to do. All communication is open by default.
- News and calls for participation are summarized in the Council blog (RSS).
- Council micro-updates can be followed at [new thread to be created in this forum] (watch)
- Council oriented conversation happens in the maemo.org Talk forum (archive) and the maemo-community mailing list (archive), in threads identified with the [Council] tag.
- Also, Council members are usually present over IRC in #maemo, happy to chat with you.
![]() |
2009-05-10
, 12:38
|
|
Posts: 1,605 |
Thanked: 1,601 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Southern California
|
#46
|
![]() |
2009-05-10
, 16:06
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#47
|
Please tell what is your opiniom on this proposal made yesterday:
Open communication is one of the core values of the Community Council, both to serve as an example to Nokia and because it's the right thing to do. All communication is open by default.
* News and calls for participation are summarized in the Council blog (RSS).
How will integration of "Council Blog" happen with the forums and mailing lists to be one form of communication?
(Additionally I wish it could be called "Council News" Blog indicates opinion, although council members are voted in for their opinions, something rubs me the wrong way about it, perhaps another thread, another day)
* Council micro-updates can be followed at [new thread to be created in this forum] (watch)
I think this should be a forum section, with multiple topics
* Council oriented conversation happens in the maemo.org Talk forum (archive) and the maemo-community mailing list (archive), in threads identified with the [Council] tag.
I assume this will change once integration happens
* Also, Council members are usually present over IRC in #maemo, happy to chat with you.
Council members, fans and discontents, does anybody disagree on this? Any ideas for improvement?
One day this maemo.org forum here and the maemo-community list there will be just the same. Different instances and interfaces of a same communication channel.
Anybody against this? If not please support Reggie in this work (e.g. not bothering him about anything else if you think such task is the most important in his plate).
Great so why are we debating this? Please can you identify how this will happen, who the players are? is it just Reggie? What technical hurdles are involved and do we expertise within the community to help move this forward? These are the things I want to hear, and if they are happening, how can we give greater visibility to these type of things to help them get accomplished faster?
No, because beyond the intention to do it the technical details have not yet been hashed out.
Before this integration happens maemo.org forum and mailing list users are expected to be equally informed by the council about what is relevant and what requires actions. The council blog is the place for that. If there are active announcements they should be made both in the forum and the mailing list. People willing to start a discussion about a council related topic will do it from the place he likes better. It's the responsibility of the council to call for a wider debate if the topic deserves it.
This means that a forum user doesn't need to subscribe to a mailing list unless he wants to follow certain topics more closely. And this means that a mailing list user doesn't need to follow a forum unless he wants to watch certain topics more closely. There are also third ways useful for the time being: mailing list addicts can subscribe to threads to receive email notifications, forum addicts can go to http://n2.nabble.com/maemo-community...-f2589537.html and browse/post at will.
Does anybody disagree on this? Any ideas for improvement?
The whole chat debate is quite irrelevant, honestly. There is simply not a relevant amount of council related discussions there. Scheduled meetings are another story: they should be announced in advance, everybody should be able to join (via pure IRC or things like http://mibbit.com ) and the minutes and logs should be published.
Does anybody disagree on this? Any ideas for improvement?
Please don't get stuck in the little stones when all our hands are needed to move the big obstacles away.
![]() |
2009-05-10
, 20:03
|
|
Posts: 1,605 |
Thanked: 1,601 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Southern California
|
#48
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to timsamoff For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-05-10
, 23:37
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#49
|
GA's response did not indicate much was already going on this topic. Can you answer any of my questions above?
The chat debate isn't really only for council activities, it's just for access to #maemo or #maemo-meetings for logged in users.
I would like to see perhaps a quarterly all hands meeting run by council in #maemo-meeting, where some BS feel good news topics can be discussed. Perhaps thats another thread
The Following User Says Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-05-11
, 00:03
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#50
|
Why do you feel the need to find error in the content of a post and then remark about it in your reply?
Is it a way to avoid the issue or do you truly feel that an issue has no merit if a t is not crossed or an i does not have a dot.
Concentrate on improvements to the original maemo.org sites and guess what... you will have more visitors, myself included. Ultimately we will have more members as a result.
Continue "fixing" this site and treating members who identify with the forum as less involved or not able to understand things of a "technical" nature and you will have less visitors, myself included.
Is that concise enough for you? Were all my t's crossed?
****
A good thread is a work of art and most active forum members know this. They take pride in what is presented and know how to present it. They check all their links and code and stand by ready to serve the viewer more information if needed by responding to any questions the viewer may have on the subject at hand.
Seems to me that these traits are something maemo.org needs more, and not less of.
The thing we all may be forgetting is that for every active member of a forum there are usually many others who just visit to learn.
BTW, this was the issue for all those playing along at home.
Last edited by YoDude; 2009-05-10 at 03:25.