![]() |
2009-06-02
, 16:37
|
|
Posts: 2,041 |
Thanked: 1,066 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Houston
|
#81
|
![]() |
2009-06-02
, 19:16
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#82
|
I think there is one key difference: The GPS you most likely use only in the car... so why not just leave it there all the time? The media player though... that you take with you everywhere, so there you have a point.
![]() |
2009-06-02
, 19:30
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#83
|
We just can't get away from that Other Device Required paradigm, can we?
The Following User Says Thank You to johnkzin For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-06-02
, 19:52
|
Posts: 1,097 |
Thanked: 650 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#84
|
I'm sticking with my opinion that the first ~4" screen without the N810's peripheral real estate will be a mind-blowing success.
I take that back: COULD be.
![]() |
2009-06-02
, 20:00
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#85
|
Exactly.
I don't want to have to carry this "other device" besides my Phone. My phone should be able to do all of the things those "other [pocketable] devices" do, where those "other devices" are:
- Mobile Phone(*) (with voice, SMS/MMS, and WWAN data)
- Pocketable Linux/Unix computer
- Pocketable Internet (email, IM, etc.) device
- Pocketable full-feature/experience Web device
- Pocketable PIM-type device
- Pocketable Media Player
- Pocketable Game Player
- Pocketable GPS
The Following User Says Thank You to pycage For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-06-02
, 20:01
|
|
Posts: 2,041 |
Thanked: 1,066 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Houston
|
#86
|
Exactly.
I don't want to have to carry this "other device" besides my Phone. My phone should be able to do all of the things those "other [pocketable] devices" do, where those "other devices" are:
- Mobile Phone(*) (with voice, SMS/MMS, and WWAN data)
- Pocketable Linux/Unix computer
- Pocketable Internet (email, IM, etc.) device
- Pocketable full-feature/experience Web device
- Pocketable Media Player
- Pocketable Game Player
- Pocketable GPS
![]() |
2009-06-02
, 20:04
|
Posts: 1,097 |
Thanked: 650 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#87
|
Good that you did not notice any difference with the screen size. But if it looked so good on a 3.5 screen how many times more nicer would it look in a 4.1 or greater screen.
![]() |
2009-06-02
, 20:14
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#88
|
But all the above things mentioned are better on a bigger screen. So why not have an option to have a device with a bigger screen.
![]() |
2009-06-02
, 20:53
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#89
|
I'm trying my best to consolidate gadgets. When I go to my car now, it's:
Nokia N810
Garmin GPS
iPhone 3G
Sony PSP or Nintendo DSi (sometimes)
There's an overlap in features, but I'm tired of carrying so much to my car and charging so much while in the house. I wanted to get rid of two of these... the Nokia N810/Garmin GPS (originally the N810's GPS was to be the only one... yeah right).
Exactly.
I don't want to have to carry this "other device" besides my Phone. My phone should be able to do all of the things those "other [pocketable] devices" do, where those "other devices" are:
- Mobile Phone(*) (with voice, SMS/MMS, and WWAN data)
- Pocketable Linux/Unix computer
- Pocketable Internet (email, IM, etc.) device
- Pocketable full-feature/experience Web device
- Pocketable PIM-type device
- Pocketable Media Player
- Pocketable Game Player
- Pocketable GPS
(* included because, depending on your perspective, the phone might be the "primary device", or the "other device")
Any solution for my pocket where I have to get some or all of those functions by carrying "another device" is an insufficient solution.
![]() |
2009-06-02
, 20:59
|
|
Posts: 2,041 |
Thanked: 1,066 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Houston
|
#90
|
Yes, I do agree - how much nicer would it look on a 7" screen - just imagine (but I am drooling with the thought)... but why oh why didn't Nokia make the tablets 7" in the first place ?
Because for a nice pocketable Tablet form factor 4" was considered just perfect by the Nokia designers.
Similarly for a pocketable form and use as a Phone form factor, a 3.5" (or ~ 4" to quote Texrat) is an ideal form factor as considered by Nokia, Samsung, Apple, Motorola and other phone mfrs.
Yes granted for those who are not looking for a phone in a tablet - your main quibble can be that why include a phone and drive up the prices, lock down the device, etc etc.
But the main point seems to be stuck at why a < 4" screen on the new "phone" device ? Lets get over that - as that is a part of the best form-factor for a phone (and we know the N900 is going to be a phone).
Its about time we accepted that yes - Nokia has decided to bring out a Maemo phone first rather than another Maemo tablet (which might come later). So if that is accepted, then I think we can now all agree that for a phone, a 3.5" screen seems a good enough fit and not that noticeble a downgrade (in fact I wouldn't want to hold up a 4" or > 4" screened phone to my ears).