![]() |
2009-08-27
, 01:19
|
Posts: 237 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Powell, OH
|
#101
|
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 02:26
|
|
Posts: 274 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Helotes, TX
|
#102
|
I think the problem is people keep throwing around the $700. If you're in the US there is no benefit in getting an unlocked phone unless you like carrier jumping at a whim. It's not like you get a discount if you bring your own phone (in the US). So just like Pre and iPhone owners you probably get it for somewhere between $199 - $399 on contract.
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 02:33
|
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 233 times |
Joined on Jul 2009
@ São Paulo, SP, Brasil
|
#103
|
When I first heard about the N810 and Maemo, it was on sale for about $350 from Nokia's website. I believe $400 was the normal price on the website. Needless to say, if the price tag is $700, I'll be holding off for a while.
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 02:46
|
Posts: 237 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Powell, OH
|
#104
|
That $700 is a very real number if, as indicated, the "N900" is only going to be available at the "subsidized" rate through T-Mobile. Since I am on AT&T, and have no pressing desire to jump, I would have to buy an unlocked phone at full price, and swap my SIM.
Don't be fooled, though. "subsidized" is in quotes for a reason. It really isn't subsidized, you're paying for it (and more) through the two years of your contract. So, it's more like leasing, with interest.
The cell phone status quo in the U.S. is outrageous. We are held hostage to these monopolies, and pay them for the privilege.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to theflew For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 03:12
|
|
Posts: 274 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Helotes, TX
|
#105
|
Technically you're not paying for it since the cost of your service does not change regardless of whether you sign a contract or not. Sure the cost of "subsidized" phones are part of the underlying service cost, but the phone companies could care less if you walk in with a unlocked phone since you'll still be paying the same monthly cost as someone on contract. They probably like you more since they would have made more of a profit.
I agree the status quo isn't good, but don't pretend the options with the N900 are any different than the Pre or iPhone. The only crime here is cell phone manufacture artificially price the unlocked devices high to force you into a carrier.
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 04:43
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#106
|
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 06:22
|
Posts: 39 |
Thanked: 30 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
|
#107
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Kypeli For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 07:24
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#108
|
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 08:19
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#109
|
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 09:28
|
|
Posts: 274 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Helotes, TX
|
#110
|
This is just sad. People ranting about the price of a device - and neither have been announced. It can be $700, but it can also be $300! Your guess is as good as mine. Stop complaining before you really see an announcement.
The Following User Says Thank You to deeteroderdas For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
interest, n900, poll |
Thread Tools | |
|