Active Topics
-
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (3)
to SailfishOS by edp17 - 10 hrs, 24 mins ago -
The N900 is now 15 years old! (6)
to Nokia N900 by Macros - 1 day, 14 hrs ago -
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 2 days, 3 hrs ago -
n770 youtube video (0)
to General by nmdv - 6 days, 2 hrs ago - more...
|
2009-09-19
, 03:08
|
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#32
|
Originally Posted by Nathan
I was just looking at amazon.com. It took me a while to even find the N900 - I ended up doing a search for it. This is what I found :
Well, it seems to be "Best" seller on Amazon. Last time I checked it was in 8th place and all that was ahead of it was blue tooth ear pieces and $15 screen protectors. Thats good news.
"
Amazon.com Sales Rank: #17 in Cell Phones & Service (See Bestsellers in Cell Phones & Service)
Popular in this category: (What's this?)
#2 in Cell Phones & Service > Accessories > Unlocked Phones
"
In Cell Phones and Service, BlackBerry Pearl 8100 Unlocked is at #10, but everything else above the N900 is an accessory.
I don't know why "Unlocked phones" is even in the "Accessories" section, but being #2 is nice enough - the above BB is #1.
What's strange is, if I go directly to 'Unlocked cell phones' using the top menu bar, and then 'sort by bestselling', then N900 is nowhere in sight....ah, there it is on page 4 - it's #93. I can only assume that this sorting is done by total sales, rather than just the last week or something. Anyone know?
 |
|
2009-09-19
, 03:10
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#33
|
Originally Posted by ioioio
Well, as the person who created and wrote that article, it's funny to see it used here to back up an argument.
but the term internet tablet.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Tablet
And the information in parenthesis next to the n900 entry kind of prove my point. But as someone just posted, it's all speculation until I get my hands on it.
__________________
Ryan Abel
Ryan Abel
|
|
2009-09-19
, 03:13
|
|
Posts: 86 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#34
|
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles
LOL I should check wiki histories more often.
Well, as the person who created and wrote that article, it's funny to see it used here to back up an argument.
 |
|
2009-09-19
, 03:14
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#35
|
Originally Posted by Laughing Man
I think the #1 reason for crashing iPhone apps is due to lack of memory, which is common on iPhone 2G & 3G. They come with 128MB of RAM and after loading the OS there's around 50-60MB free, but it can go down to below 40MB if you load many 3rd party extensions from Cydia (the jailbroken appstore).
Jailbroken iPhones can have multi-tasking through an app called backgrounder. But the app isn't reliable and some apps tend to crash.
The term for iPhone tasking is serial-tasking (one item at a time).
The 3GS comes with 256MB RAM, which leaves about 3x as much free memory than the 2G\3G (150MB-ish) and alleviates this problem...
ps: backgrounder + kirikae (task switcher)
pps: I also think the term 'mobile computer' is... um.. sub optimal.
It's a mouthful, kind of nondescriptive (as it doesn't indicate how small the N900) is, and the generic 'computer' has lots its edge.
Last edited by ysss; 2009-09-19 at 03:57.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-09-19
, 03:46
|
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#36
|
Ah I haven't heard of kirikae yet. That's new. And yeah that makes sense for why the apps crash. With the way Apple has the system setup. Each app is guaranteed to have the most resources available to it since ideally (following Apple's guidelines) no other app besides what Apple does (phone ability, etc..etc..) should be running. But if you introduce backgrounder (and now kirikae) then now apps that were programmed (if this is the case) to use whatever RAM is available will now be fighting for that same RAM.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss
They're maemo and MeeGo...
"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
| The Following User Says Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-09-19
, 12:36
|
|
Posts: 112 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#37
|
Originally Posted by pycage
See, now that's even stupider than Nokia or Apple not supporting MMS. That's the kind of situation that I don't want to happen with operators disabling stuff enough to effectively break the device (I know multi-tasking won't go...).
Well, it can actually multitask as it's an OS-X kernel, but since there's no task switcher, you have to quit one app before starting the next. Jailbroken iPhones can have multitasking, from what I've heard.
 |
|
2009-09-19
, 13:18
|
|
Posts: 861 |
Thanked: 734 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Nomadic
|
#38
|
The original question this thread is interesting, it doesn't account for the times when those models were introduced except for the N900, aka the queston is biased.
Of that list, the N95 is/was the most influential and most innovative release. However that's an easy answer, thw N95 was nothing like anything else, ans was slose enough in terms of a frame of reference that it broke perceptions of mobile. Heck, Nokia called it a mobile computer...
...the N900 hasn't done anything yet. If it changes how we use mobile computing, then history will show that of this list, its Nokia's best, smarter mobile computing device.
Of that list, the N95 is/was the most influential and most innovative release. However that's an easy answer, thw N95 was nothing like anything else, ans was slose enough in terms of a frame of reference that it broke perceptions of mobile. Heck, Nokia called it a mobile computer...
...the N900 hasn't done anything yet. If it changes how we use mobile computing, then history will show that of this list, its Nokia's best, smarter mobile computing device.
 |
|
2009-09-19
, 13:31
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#39
|
Originally Posted by zerojay
repeating it over and over will not magically make it become true. the screen on the N810 already is too small for most of my use cases. how could i not notice that it got even smaller??
The smaller screen is something you won't even notice unless you have really bad eyesight. You won't even realize it unless you put it side by side with an N810... and even then, you realize it just doesn't matter.
|
|
2009-09-19
, 17:35
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#40
|
Originally Posted by benny1967
Somehow everybody I know who has a device keeps insisting the screen size isn't an issue, and somehow everybody else keeps insisting it is.
repeating it over and over will not magically make it become true. the screen on the N810 already is too small for most of my use cases. how could i not notice that it got even smaller??
I wonder who's better qualified to judge?
__________________
Ryan Abel
Ryan Abel
I'm just curious as to why use such an esoteric moniker and don't advertise yet.