moot-goner
|
2009-09-23
, 18:12
|
Posts: 3 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#41
|
|
2009-09-23
, 18:16
|
Posts: 521 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#42
|
Okay, let's ask me.
Easy to Reproduce Crashes: I can easily fix those in less than an hour.
Random Crashes: How random? How often? How catastrophic? Depending on your answers and assuming it's a software issue, the time-to-fix usually ranges from 5 1/2 hours to ∞ - 1. But this topic is too big for this discussion.
Have you ever been part of a successful software project? Good developers don't freak out like you're suggesting. In your context, absolutes like "never end well" are FUD. WEEKS is a long time, and it doesn't frighten a good development group if they're in bug-fixing mode. Sh*tty management is what usually frightens a good development group.
If it's your code, bug fixing shouldn't be difficult. Good design is where all the real work is, right? So, children, the moral of the story is: Worry less about bugs and worry more about design, then things will always (okay, mostly) end well.
Back to the topic:
Nokia needs to find out what happened, having a high profile shoot-from-the-hip blogger as an extended part of your QA department doesn't seem like a good thing. That's what we're here for. And my prototype should be arriving any day now...
The Following User Says Thank You to bugelrex For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-23
, 18:19
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#43
|
The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-23
, 18:28
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#44
|
A large project which exhibits these behaviors WEEKS before release is in trouble. Even though the bug can be fixed in hours, it introduces risk, QA cycles have to be redone. You cannot be sure your changes have not affected anything else. To think otherwise is "hacker" mentality and not a "software development".
|
2009-09-23
, 18:40
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#45
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-23
, 18:47
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#46
|
Anyway, hoping again the problems are only visible in Eldar's weird unit and not issues being "withheld" by fanboy reviewers (check out how bad reviewers of the N97 were crucified by fanboys!)
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-09-23
, 18:49
|
Posts: 631 |
Thanked: 1,123 times |
Joined on Sep 2005
@ Helsinki
|
#47
|
He's basically saying that the N900 at Nokia world was a special firmware build. I "think" he's updated with a newer firmware and still seeing stability issues
|
2009-09-23
, 18:52
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#48
|
Maybe Nokia needs to have a look at which Russian IP addresses tried to grab, and have succesfully grabbed, firmware updates past months. With that (3G?) IP address it won't be too hard to find out the IMEI. Nor hard to track down this person, and prosecute him.
|
2009-09-23
, 19:35
|
|
Posts: 1,310 |
Thanked: 820 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Irving, TX
|
#49
|
|
2009-09-23
, 19:37
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#50
|
Tags |
eldar, nokia n900 preview |
Thread Tools | |
|