Reply
Thread Tools
mrojas's Avatar
Posts: 733 | Thanked: 991 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#301
Originally Posted by eldarmurtazin View Post
mrojas
Sometimes I do a favour for some companies and send bug reports etc. Not in this particular case of N900.
Of course you aren't. You yourself said that Nokia isn't giving review units. May it be because.... (wait for it).... (suspense).... they don't consider the unit is ready for reviews yet?

Next thing - please read what I write before.
I have read your Twitters and I would love to read the report you just published, but it is Russian. And you yourself mocked the Google Translator.

My work is different. And I dont care about products, companies much. Due to one reason - I write about all devices/companies. For you may be N900 is a single device, for me one among others. Good to check, but not the ultimate one
While it is pretty obvious what you don't care about, once again: you are not being criticized by what you do. You are being criticized by how you do it.

And just for the record, I am not all that impressed by the N900 - I am not getting one.

N900 are producing now. It means that SW is installed on device now. Not tomorrow, not in October or November. Now. And it wont be updated in a shop. May be it will be updated before going to shelfs. May be. But changes wont be dramatic.
Nokia devices are updated just before shipping (ask Texrat who worked in Nokia). Also, everytime I have bought a Nokia device in a Nokia store, the clerk offered to update the software before me leaving.

We know the changes won't be dramatic, like the won't add MMS or portrait support overnight. But they way you put it, Nokia is willing to let a show stopping 3G bug go into production without any care or attention to it. Sorry, I am not buying it.

Last edited by mrojas; 2009-09-25 at 21:18.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mrojas For This Useful Post:
mrojas's Avatar
Posts: 733 | Thanked: 991 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#302
Originally Posted by JayOnThaBeat View Post
I think Nokia, in fact, does give Eldar these units on the down-low.

Otherwise, why wouldn't they be filing police reports and having the 5-0 go to his home with a warrant to recover the "N920" he has in his possession?
I don't think there is Lex Nokia where he lives.
 
Posts: 521 | Thanked: 296 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#303
Eldar,
The battery report is very much appreciated, especially the comparison with N97.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#304
Originally Posted by sachin007 View Post
I know this is off topic, but do you remember that guy's user name?
He had a couple, and I have a funny infamous post somewhere that GA saved, but offhand I don't...
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#305
Tonight's descent into chaos is brought to you by Twizzlers, the candy with spin!
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Posts: 262 | Thanked: 232 times | Joined on Aug 2009
#306
Originally Posted by eldarmurtazin View Post
You are w8 too much from 140 symbols in twitter.
Yes, I agree, that's why I wanted more comments

Open OS isnt a key for success. You could build propriety OS and have a great success (check Apple story).
I don't agree entirely. Being open is a key advantage against Apple, and competing against their halo is hard enough as it is. Getting the FOSS crowd backing an OS could make the difference.

But yes, even a closed source OS can be successful .



1) no way for that. Handheld device could replace in 5 years PC which we see today on market. But future PC or descktops, whatever will be different in all ways. So gap between devices will exists
Disagree strongly. In 5 years, desktops will be even faster, yes, but phones will be fast enough to be "good enough" for 99% of the business user's laptop needs. Screen size is obviously a problem.

Thanks for showing up.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to livefreeordie For This Useful Post:
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#307
Originally Posted by eldarmurtazin View Post



Laughing Man
N900 is mainstream in comparisson with N810, even with N97/N97 mini it wont be a mainstream. mass production of Maemo devices planned to 2011-2012 years. Before QT integration it will be just an expiriment and devices to show new OS to the market, to grew user base. That's all.

About bug reports. All devices for test have crash logger. Astonished that you guys dont know so simple things. This logs are sending to Nokia site directly. And collect by team which devoted to software part.
Yeah, in that regard it will grow. But as for bug reports, crash logs aren't everything (as someone who use to read crash logs and as someone who has submitted them before). It's helpful to actually have people tell you what was happening, etc..etc..

It's like a study I'm doing in virtual reality now, sure we can use the video we have of them drawing the room and the objects to figure out what they're doing. But by adding a verbal component we can not only tap into what they're thinking but also get there alot faster.

Originally Posted by eldarmurtazin View Post

livefreeordie

Open OS isnt a key for success. You could build propriety OS and have a great success (check Apple story).

1) no way for that. Handheld device could replace in 5 years PC which we see today on market. But future PC or descktops, whatever will be different in all ways. So gap between devices will exists

2) Thats trend to make "open" platform. Dont think that it so great. But it will be some winners, some loosers. Openess is not a key for success.

3) from device to device no, from desktop sometimes but problems minor and very well described (will be checked and corrected for sure)
I disagree with you there. I don't think there's a need for an open OS as in open as in Linux is free or open to modify. But the winner will be whoever is open as in their OS will be found on the most products. Thus open to hardware.

As much marketshare and mindshare Apple has now, there is no way they will ever control the most marketshare simply for the fact that they limit themselves to their products. Their software, their products. But a competitor like Android or whoever else allows their OS to be put anywhere can be installed anywhere and everywhere. Eventually it would just outnumber Apple on sheer # of devices being offered and accessiblity to the population.

Will Apple still be successful say 50 years down the line? It's extremely likely simply for the reason their business strategy is "We don't need the mass marketshare, we rather have say 10-20% and charge a high premium on those and keep that percentage". And that's where they are today in the PC market.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post:
Posts: 21 | Thanked: 41 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Moscow/Berlin
#308
livefreeordie

You trying to catch Apple (or sorry Nokia heavily trying) but some others players are growing right now and Nokia isnt ready for things which are coming. Apple in terms of business model is not a rival for Nokia, is different story with moderate sells (maximum of sales is close, really close - device).

Desktops - issue with handheld devices only one - they are handheld (no big screen, no enough memory, no enough video accelerator power etc). You arent right about desktops. And some new technologies are always emerged (some of them i like a lot) No handheld could support them
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to eldarmurtazin For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#309
Originally Posted by livefreeordie View Post
Disagree strongly. In 5 years, desktops will be even faster, yes, but phones will be fast enough to be "good enough" for 99% of the business user's laptop needs. Screen size is obviously a problem.
99% is pretty strong. I'd say the smaller screens knock out about 15% of typical business needs (spreadsheets, documents, etc). From experience I can say I was able to do about 80% of my typical work on an N800 and that was 2 years ago... but 99%? I don't think we'll ever see that day.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Posts: 262 | Thanked: 232 times | Joined on Aug 2009
#310
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
99% is pretty strong. I'd say the smaller screens knock out about 15% of typical business needs (spreadsheets, documents, etc). From experience I can say I was able to do about 80% of my typical work on an N800 and that was 2 years ago... but 99%? I don't think we'll ever see that day.
That's why I included HDMI out. Would you bring a laptop if you could connect your phone to any TV at 1920x1080 and use KOffice?
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to livefreeordie For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
eldar, nokia n900 preview

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:28.