The Following 35 Users Say Thank You to dneary For This Useful Post: | ||
allnameswereout, asyik, attila77, benny1967, Bundyo, daperl, frals, GeneralAntilles, GeraldKo, Jaffa, javispedro, JayOnThaBeat, Johnx, lardman, lcuk, msoini, muki, mullf, noventa98, penguinbait, Peter@Maemo Marketing, qgil, qwerty12, sachin007, sjgadsby, Soulfarmer, Stskeeps, Texrat, thecursedfly, timsamoff, VDVsx, yerga, ysss, zerojay |
![]() |
2009-09-29
, 11:48
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#2
|
![]() |
2009-09-29
, 12:01
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#3
|
![]() |
2009-09-29
, 12:11
|
Posts: 263 |
Thanked: 679 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Lyon, France
|
#4
|
Its interesting to me, that the # of "first choice" votes match the winners. It bums me out that lcuk received the 3rd highest # of total votes yet did not get a seat on council.
![]() |
2009-09-29
, 12:26
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#5
|
The joys of STV - if you're always the 2nd or 3rd preference, and you don't get enough 1st choices, you're not going to get elected.
If you do the same test with just the 1st to 5th preference votes, how does it work out? (I haven't tried, just wondering).
Dave.
![]() |
2009-09-29
, 12:41
|
Posts: 263 |
Thanked: 679 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Lyon, France
|
#6
|
![]() |
2009-09-29
, 13:00
|
|
Posts: 1,028 |
Thanked: 578 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
@ Chicago
|
#7
|
Looking at the preferences distribution, it's clear that lcuk was 3rd, 4th or 5th preference for a lot of people, but penguinbait, VDVsx and gcobb are all ahead of him in 1st and 2nd preferences - and those weigh more on the result than 4th or 5th preference.
Cheers,
Dave.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to JayOnThaBeat For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-09-29
, 15:12
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#8
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-09-29
, 15:26
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#9
|
Congratulations to everybody!
Dear lazyweb, how was the participation compared to previous votings? The merge with Talk can be seen now clearly in the results, but what about the universe of voters and the percentage of participation?
![]() |
2009-09-29
, 15:26
|
|
Posts: 1,070 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#10
|
Congratulations to everybody!
Dear lazyweb, how was the participation compared to previous votings? The merge with Talk can be seen now clearly in the results, but what about the universe of voters and the percentage of participation?
The results of the Maemo Community Council are available - and we have a new Council. The Council for the coming 6 months will be:
You can see the details of the count at http://maemo.org/vote/results.php?election_id=7
Congratulations to all the successful candidates, and commiserations to all those who were not elected.
For anyone who wishes to double-check the election results, you can obtain a list of the votes at http://maemo.org/vote/votes.php?election_id=7 and you can download the ballots on OpenSTV format, and re-run the election count yourself, at http://maemo.org/vote/blt.php?election_id=7
Cheers,
Dave.