![]() |
2009-10-10
, 20:26
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#72
|
The Following User Says Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-10-10
, 20:33
|
Posts: 369 |
Thanked: 191 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Virginia
|
#73
|
+1 brainstorm eco hippie forum (CO2 neutral). Now a wooden N900 case instead of plastic one..
The Following User Says Thank You to Hogwash For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-10-10
, 20:42
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#74
|
To go back to the topic of this thread (assuming anyone's eyeballs still work after those fingernails) that is the problem. "You can build", not "Nokia will build."
![]() |
2009-10-10
, 21:11
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#75
|
Why can they all run OS 3.1.2?
You missed the point. It's not about what's been added to the firmware/hardware. It's the fact the OS - as in Maemo 5 & Maemo 6 - may not be upgradeable on the N900.
![]() |
2009-10-10
, 21:17
|
|
Posts: 1,559 |
Thanked: 1,786 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Boston
|
#76
|
![]() |
2009-10-10
, 21:23
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 747 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
|
#77
|
In one year your shiny N900 is like what today the N810 is for the general population: nothing. Even though the hardware differences will be, like, 2%. It happensWe are starting to see it already...
![]() |
2009-10-10
, 21:45
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#78
|
But that last sentence is exactly what I mean: "You can build", not "Nokia will build". Why are you waiting for Nokia to build it? Compaq (for example) won't provide you with updated versions of Ubuntu working with your 386 PC. As I said, you can install whatever OS you want on your N900.
Of course, I agree with the last part. Better not to expect Maemo6 to run on N900, as much as I don't expect Fremantle to run in N810. Not because it's not possible, but because nobody might want to do it.
In one year your shiny N900 is like what today the N810 is for the general population: nothing. Even though the hardware differences will be, like, 2%. It happensWe are starting to see it already...
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to allnameswereout For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-10-10
, 22:15
|
Posts: 3 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#79
|
My N82 always shows the homescreen in portrait mode even when everything else is in landscape. The N85 and other phones support landscape homescreen but not mine. There's no reason why it shouldn't have gotten that feature.
![]() |
2009-10-10
, 22:55
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Helsinki
|
#80
|
I suggest you guys check this out:
http://www.umpcportal.com/wp-content...ture_00073.jpg
From this:
http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/10/ma...-maemo-summit/
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PetriS For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
compatibility, future, harmattan, harmattan is for new $$$, maemo, maemo 6, n900, speculation, upgrade |
Thread Tools | |
|
My point was that a a phone manufacturer, Nokia has not historically been concerned with making their latest OS compatible with existing hardware. If you are buying the N900, you should buy it based on the current capabilities of Maemo 5, not on the potential benefits of Maemo 6.