Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 670 | Thanked: 747 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
#11
Originally Posted by The_Solutor View Post
Palm is a very well recognized brand in the US, and has a very good experience on the UI and ergonomic of the mobile devices.
Palm is pretty much a has-been in the US. The name can't be worth $2 billion. If it's patents Palm owns, what are they and why isn't Palm making big bucks from them now?

As far as any UI goodies (or anything else) in WebOS, what does it do significantly better than Maemo? The 'flip-away cards' thingie? Ya gotta be kiddin' me...so what?

And if Nokia buys Palm, doesn't Palm + Nokia + WebOS + Symbian + Maemo sound like a great recipe for customer and marketing confusion and complexity?

Seems to me Nokia could do a lot more to get into the mid-to-high-end US smartphone market by investing a billion or two into Maemo development and a marketing blitz than buying a sickly Palm.

...buying Palm could make perfect sense for Nokia, as buying Chrysler did for Fiat.
Buying Chrysler didn't work our well at all for Daimler-Benz. Smart as they are, they still lost almost 100% of the billions they invested. It won't work for Fiat either.
__________________
Registered Linux user #266531.

Last edited by Crashdamage; 2009-11-14 at 16:20.
 
HangLoose's Avatar
Posts: 319 | Thanked: 289 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Lisboa, Portugal
#12
Nokia should concentrate in distribution off content just like Apple...

Buying palm (a dead horse) wont make any difference.

One thing that I notice is that the same media (generally north american, of course) that is so quick to doom nokia tries to force this buyout...

If theres still some sense in Espoo they wont even get excited in thinking about this... They gotta buy some well recognized content distribution and build on it. Spotify would be great (even though its a loss machine still) since they have many labels signed and the distribution of Video will be coming soon...
 
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#13
people are over looking the fact the Palm are well know in NA and could be Nokia's easiest way of breaking US market
if they buy Palm then released a few very good devices as US exclusives under that name then it could be just what Nokia are needing
 
The_Solutor's Avatar
Posts: 142 | Thanked: 49 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Italy
#14
Originally Posted by Crashdamage View Post
Palm is pretty much a has-been in the US. The name can't be worth $2 billion. If it's patents Palm owns, what are they and why isn't Palm making big bucks from them now?

As far as any UI goodies (or anything else) in WebOS, what does it do significantly better than Maemo? The 'flip-away cards' thingie? Ya gotta be kiddin' me...so what?

The PRE is a lovely device, the UI is a lot of well refined than Maemo, the form factor is almost perfect, but the build quality is incredily low and the quality itself is too variable from device to device.

Nokia can inject his experience and his money on a theoretically well done product. Just as the modern engines from Fiat can help Chrisler whit his stone age technology.
Buying Chrysler didn't work our well at all for Daimler-Benz. Smart as they are, they still lost almost 100% of the billions they invested. It won't work for Fiat either.
Italians do it better, remember !!!
 
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#15
* Established brand recognition in US.
* Patents. Many patents...
* Expertise in UI specialization & design.
* Pre is established competitor for iPhone.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
Posts: 670 | Thanked: 747 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
#16
Originally Posted by allnameswereout View Post
* Established brand recognition in US.
* Patents. Many patents...
* Expertise in UI specialization & design.
* Pre is established competitor for iPhone.
Read my previous post again (#11) and see if you still think those are $2 billion worth of reasons.

Keep in mind that the Pre has not sold particularly well and sales are going down, not up.
__________________
Registered Linux user #266531.
 
munky261's Avatar
Posts: 1,674 | Thanked: 171 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Anderson, IN
#17
Originally Posted by mullf View Post
That's a stock market term? I thought is was a dating term.


It is, at least for me. LOL
__________________
There is only one Return, and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
 
Posts: 171 | Thanked: 35 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#18
Nokia wants Palm so we can use the N900 with iTunes
 
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#19
Originally Posted by Crashdamage View Post
Palm is pretty much a has-been in the US. The name can't be worth $2 billion. If it's patents Palm owns, what are they and why isn't Palm making big bucks from them now?

As far as any UI goodies (or anything else) in WebOS, what does it do significantly better than Maemo? The 'flip-away cards' thingie? Ya gotta be kiddin' me...so what?

And if Nokia buys Palm, doesn't Palm + Nokia + WebOS + Symbian + Maemo sound like a great recipe for customer and marketing confusion and complexity?
.
1) Patents =/= instant money. You can have patents on great ideas but suck at implementing them or convincing why people need it.

Maybe WebOS + QT might be a way for inter-operatibility of applications from Symbian to Maemo platforms. It would also lessen the problem of loss of support when Maemo 5 goes to Maemo 6.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
somedude's Avatar
Posts: 1,312 | Thanked: 736 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#20
Originally Posted by draco.bdn View Post
Nokia wants Palm so we can use the N900 with iTunes
I like that.
As somebody else said patent. I am pretty sure that the patents owned by palm is worth more than $2B in the long run
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19.