![]() |
2009-12-08
, 22:50
|
|
Posts: 700 |
Thanked: 846 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#33
|
I'm sure I'm missing something, but why would you want an FTP server when you've got SSH?
![]() |
2009-12-08
, 22:56
|
Posts: 107 |
Thanked: 94 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#34
|
![]() |
2009-12-09
, 11:28
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#35
|
![]() |
2009-12-09
, 11:34
|
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Slovenia
|
#36
|
I'm sure I'm missing something, but why would you want an FTP server when you've got SSH?
![]() |
2009-12-09
, 13:19
|
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 572 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford
|
#37
|
Beause SSH isn't the most efficient when it come to transfer large amounts of information. FTP is designed to push large amounts of data down a pipeline.
The Following User Says Thank You to ewan For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-09
, 13:53
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#38
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pelago For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-09
, 14:58
|
Posts: 1,283 |
Thanked: 370 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ South Florida
|
#39
|
IME both scp and rsync over SSH do pretty well on efficiency, have the advantage of supporting compression, and critically, encrypt the authentication step, which ftp does in plain text.
Which is a fine reason for wanting an FTP client. Not so much for wanting an FTP server, unless your hosting is running on an N900.
![]() |
2009-12-09
, 15:30
|
|
Posts: 1,338 |
Thanked: 1,055 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ California, USA / Jordan
|
#40
|
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900