![]() |
2007-04-13
, 15:53
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#12
|
This is not a competitor for the following reasons.
1) Windows. A machine running 'big brother inside' is not a competitor to a free OS.
2) Price. $797... in japan. Expect european prices to be near 1200 euro. Not a competitor at 2x-3x the price.
![]() |
2007-04-13
, 15:55
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#13
|
![]() |
2007-04-13
, 16:00
|
Posts: 84 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Apr 2006
@ California
|
#14
|
![]() |
2007-04-15
, 10:33
|
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ MI, USA
|
#15
|
![]() |
2007-04-15
, 18:27
|
Posts: 213 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Barbados
|
#16
|
![]() |
2007-04-16
, 11:11
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#17
|
![]() |
2007-04-16
, 13:48
|
Posts: 213 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Barbados
|
#18
|
![]() |
2007-04-16
, 14:13
|
Posts: 372 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#19
|
We want something to put in our pockets that can browse the net and send email.
Do they both do that. Yes.
It's a competitor. OS is irrelevant.
The MAC is a competitor to the PC. A Unix server will compete with a Windows server.
What will make the difference is the individual features that the purchaser wants. For example whether he wants windows or Unix. Five hard disk or 2. SATA or SCSI. USB portsd or legacy Serial and parallel ports.
But the servers in their entirety, to function as servers are competitors.